Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 3 of 21HMG (Human Menopausal Gonadotropin) literatureeuropepmc · RCT2026

Human menopausal gonadotrophin in a pre-filled injection pen is non-inferior to the US-approved powder formulation.

The HP-HMG pen formulation demonstrated non-inferiority to the powder formulation in terms of fertilized oocytes, but the clinical significance of the differences observed should be interpreted with caution.

Read at europepmcAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the hmg (human menopausal gonadotropin) corpus
0
Preclinical
15
Observational
0
Open-label
3
Randomised · this one
3
Reviews

Summary and findings

This study evaluated the non-inferiority of highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG) in a pre-filled injection pen compared to the US-approved powder formulation in women undergoing ovarian stimulation. The primary endpoint was the number of fertilized oocytes, with a starting dose of 225 IU for the first 5 days. The results indicated non-inferiority of the pen formulation.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.90). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
Mean number of fertilized 2PN oocytes: 8.2 ± 5.5 (pen) vs 6.6 ± 4.3 (powder), adjusted treatment difference: 1.50, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.42.2026

Abstract

The authors’ words, as europepmc supplied them

<h4>Research question</h4>Is non-inferiority demonstrated for highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG) in an injection pen versus the US approved HP-HMG powder formulation for number of fertilized oocytes in women undergoing ovarian stimulation?<h4>Design</h4>Randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, multicentre, non-inferiority trial at 19 US reproductive medicine centres enrolling 401 women ages 18‒42 years, randomised 1:1 to HP-HMG pen or HP-HMG powder. After downregulation in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) cycle, ovaries were stimulated with HP-HMG pen or HP-HMG powder at a starting dose of 225 IU for the first 5 days, with subsequent dose adjustments as needed. The number of fertilized (two pronuclei [2PN]) oocytes 19 ± 2 h after insemination was the primary end point.<h4>Results</h4>The primary end point was met, and HP-HMG pen was non-inferior to HP-HMG powder, with the mean ± SD number of fertilized 2PN oocytes 8.2 ± 5.5 and 6.6 ± 4.3, respectively (adjusted treatment difference: 1.50, 95% CI 0.57 to 2.42). The number of oocytes retrieved was 14.3 ± 8.1 with HP-HMG pen and 11.4 ± 6.3 with HP-HMG powder. The mean number of blastocysts was 4.8 ± 3.8 in the HP-HMG pen group and 3.9 ± 3.0 in the HP-HMG powder group. The ongoing pregnancy rate per started stimulation cycle was 45.0% in the HP-HMG pen group and 42.7% in the HP-HMG powder group and the live birth rate was 44.1% and 42.2% after fresh transfer, respectively. The incidence of early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was 3.5% in both groups.<h4>Conclusions</h4>HP-HMG as a solution for injection in a pre-filled injection pen is an effective and safe alternative to the approved powder formulation.

Background

The paper addresses the clinical question of whether a pre-filled injection pen formulation of Human Menopausal Gonadotropin (HMG) is as effective as the traditional powder formulation. Previous studies have established the efficacy of HMG in fertility treatments, but the convenience of a pre-filled pen may improve patient adherence. This study is significant as it explores a potentially more user-friendly option for administering HMG.

Methods

Not reported in abstract.

Results

Not reported in abstract.

Interpretation

Not reported in abstract.

Key findings

  • Not reported in abstract.

Limitations

  • Not reported in abstract.

Elsewhere in the HMG (Human Menopausal Gonadotropin) corpus

BDelayed Argon Plasma Coagulation After Endoscopic Injection Sclerotherapy for Esophageal Varices Reduces Recurrence Risk.DEN open · 2026 · n=112 · 3-year variceal recurrence: 13.9% outpatient vs 28.0% inpatient, p=0.039HumanDArtificial intelligence models for automated and semiautomated analysis and interpretation of clinical electroencephalography.The Lancet. Digital health · 2026reviewBSomatic Mosaic &lt;i&gt;AXIN2&lt;/i&gt;-associated Colonic Polyposis Predominantly Involving the Proximal Colon: A Case Report.DEN open · 2023 · n=1 · Not reported in abstract.HumanDSex-specific reproductive and hormonal factors in relation to Alzheimer’s disease-related biomarkers: A Systematic Reviewbiorxiv-preprint · 2026 · Not reported in abstract.reviewBComparison between the efficacy of short and long GnRH-a protocols as a clinical outcome for viable pregnancies in women undergoing IVF/ICSI Cycles.biorxiv-preprint · 2021 · Clinical pregnancy rates: LAP 33.12% vs SAP 28.23%, p=0.001.HumanBRecombinant Follicular Stimulating Hormone Plus Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone Versus Human Menopausal Gonadotropins- Does the Source of LH Bioactivity Affect Ovarian Stimulation Outcome?biorxiv-preprint · 2021 · Mean number of mature oocytes retrieved: 10 ± 5.8 in rFSH+rLH vs 8.3 ± 4.6 in HP-hMG, p=0.01.Human