Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 5 of 11HGH (Somatropin) literatureeuropepmc · Observational

Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Once-Weekly Injection Devices for the Treatment of Growth Hormone Deficiency.

Patients and caregivers prioritize less injection pain and ease of use when choosing long-acting growth hormone treatments, with a significant preference for the somapacitan-beco device.

Read at europepmcAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the hgh (somatropin) corpus
0
Preclinical
4
Observational · this one
0
Open-label
7
Randomised
0
Reviews

Summary and findings

This study assessed patient and caregiver preferences for once-weekly injection devices for growth hormone deficiency (GHD). A total of 100 participants, including adults, caregivers, and adolescent/caregiver dyads, completed a survey focused on the attributes of long-acting growth hormone analogues (LA-GHA). The most important attributes identified were postinjection pain (27%), the number of injections needed for a full dose (23%), and preparation time (16%).

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
82% predicted choice probability for somapacitan-beco profile.

Abstract

The authors’ words, as europepmc supplied them

<h4>Context</h4>Once-weekly long-acting growth hormone (GH) analogue (LA-GHA) treatments offer an alternative to once-daily GH injections for the treatment of children and adults with GH deficiency (GHD). With these new LA-GHA options, it is important to understand patients' and caregivers' treatment preferences.<h4>Objective</h4>This work aimed to understand the injection/device attributes important to patients with GHD and caregivers when choosing LA-GHA treatment options.<h4>Methods</h4>In this cross-sectional study, a targeted literature review and qualitative interviews informed the development of an online survey. The survey included a discrete choice experiment, comprising a series of choice tasks. Respondents selected between hypothetical, experimentally designed, once-weekly LA-GHA device features corresponding to currently available devices. Study participants were patients/caregivers in the United States, self-reporting a GHD diagnosis and current short-acting GH injection use: adults (aged ≥18 years), caregivers of children (aged 3-11 years), and dyads of adolescents (aged 12-17 years) and their caregivers.<h4>Results</h4>In total, 100 participants completed the survey: 50 adults, 25 caregivers, and 25 adolescent/caregiver dyads. Overall, the most important LA-GHA attributes identified were postinjection pain (27%), the number of injections needed for 1 full dose (23%), and the time needed to prepare the device before each injection (16%). The profile similar to somapacitan-beco had the highest predicted choice probability (82%) compared with the profiles similar to lonapegsomatropin-tcgd (16%) and somatrogon-ghla (2%).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Understanding patient and caregiver preferences for LA-GHA devices with less injection pain and greater ease of use highlights the value of shared decision-making, potentially leading to better treatment adherence and subsequent clinical outcomes.

Background

The paper addresses the preferences of patients and caregivers regarding injection devices used for growth hormone deficiency treatment. Prior research has indicated that device usability can significantly impact treatment adherence and satisfaction. Understanding these preferences is crucial for optimizing treatment regimens and enhancing patient outcomes.

Methods

Not reported in abstract.

Results

Not reported in abstract.

Interpretation

Not reported in abstract.

Key findings

  • Not reported in abstract.

Limitations

  • Not reported in abstract.

Elsewhere in the HGH (Somatropin) corpus

BHow Substance Use Patterns Shape Perceived Cardiac Concern Among An International Sample of Men Who Use Anabolic-Androgenic Steroids.PubMed · 2026 · OR=10.57, p<0.001 for injectable AAS use.HumanAChildren with Growth Hormone Deficiency Treated with Lonapegsomatropin Demonstrated Sustained Height Improvements for up to 6 Years: enliGHten Trial Final Results.europepmc · Mean height SDS was -0.39 at year 4, n=298.HumanAEfficacy and safety of once-weekly somatrogon following up to 4 years of treatment in Japanese children with growth hormone deficiency: results from an open-label extension of a phase 3 study.europepmc · 2024 · n=100 · Mean height velocity (HV) at OLE baseline was 9.78 cm/year (SD 1.59) for somatrogon vs. 7.70 cm/year (SD 1.10) for somatropin.HumanBPatient-Centric Design of the Lonapegsomatropin Auto-Injector for Growth Hormone Deficiency: Usability Validation of Safe and Effective Use.europepmc · 100% of participants (n=135) completed an injection successfully.HumanARecombinant human growth hormone (rHGH) for muscle enhancement in knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a pilot, randomised placebo-controlled trial.europepmc · Not reported in abstract.HumanAOnce-Weekly Lonapegsomatropin Was Efficacious and Well Tolerated in Chinese Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency: Results from a Phase 3 Randomized Trial.europepmc · LS mean AHV at week 52 was 10.66 ± 0.22 cm/year for weekly lonapegsomatropin and 9.75 ± 0.26 cm/year for daily somatropin; difference of 0.91 ± 0.28 cm/year (95% CI: 0.37-1.45; p = 0.0010).Human