Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 56 of 60Semaglutide literaturebiorxiv-preprint · Meta-analysis2026

Semaglutide and Suicidality in Adults with Overweight or Obesity: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

There is no conclusive evidence linking semaglutide to increased or decreased suicidality, and findings are highly imprecise.

Read at biorxiv-preprintAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the semaglutide corpus
13
Preclinical
36
Observational
2
Open-label
2
Randomised
7
Reviews · this one

Summary and findings

This study evaluated the association between semaglutide and suicidality in adults with overweight or obesity through a Bayesian meta-analysis of randomized trials. The primary outcome was completed suicide, with secondary outcomes including suicide attempts and suicidal ideation. The findings indicated no conclusive evidence of increased or decreased suicidality associated with semaglutide.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
Completed suicide: pooled OR 1.56 (95% CrI 0.55–4.67), P(OR > 1) = 80.6%, n=17,086 semaglutide vs 15,304 placebo.2026

Abstract

The authors’ words, as biorxiv-preprint supplied them

Abstract Background Concerns have been raised regarding a potential association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and suicidality. Because suicidal outcomes are exceptionally uncommon in randomized trials, conventional meta-analytic estimates may be unstable and may exclude trials with no events. We evaluated semaglutide specifically across the clinical spectrum of suicidality. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing semaglutide with placebo in adults with overweight or obesity, with or without type 2 diabetes. The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251059430) and substantively amended before data extraction to include completed suicide as the primary outcome and suicide attempt, suicidal ideation, and overall suicidal behavior/events as secondary outcomes. Arm-level counts were analyzed with a Bayesian random-effects binomial-logit model that retained double-zero studies without continuity correction. The primary prior for the pooled log-odds ratio (OR) was Normal (0,1), and an empirical Turner prior was used for between-study heterogeneity. The prior distribution represents the range and relative plausibility of treatment effects assumed before incorporating the observed trial data. We report posterior medians, 95% credible intervals (CrIs), 95% prediction intervals, and P(OR > 1) and P(OR > 1.25). Prior and frequentist sensitivity analyses were performed. Certainty of evidence was assessed separately for each outcome using GRADE across risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias. Results Fifteen unique placebo-controlled trials contributed to at least one outcome. Completed suicide was reported in eight trials (8/17,086 semaglutide vs 4/15,304 placebo; 12 events): pooled OR 1.56 (95% CrI 0.55–4.67), P(OR > 1) = 80.6%, and P(OR > 1.25) = 66.7%. For suicide attempt (12 trials; 5/19,046 vs 10/17,190), the OR was 0.51 (0.19–1.32), with P(OR > 1) = 9.0%. For suicidal ideation (eight trials; 12/17,366 vs 7/14,833), the OR was 0.93 (0.38–2.43), with P(OR > 1) = 44.8%. For overall suicidal behaviour/events (four trials; 12/11,061 vs 10/9,670), the OR was 1.06 (0.42–2.65), with P(OR > 1) = 54.6%. All credible and prediction intervals crossed unity, conclusions were qualitatively stable across all nine prior combinations for every outcome, and frequentist estimates were directionally concordant. GRADE certainty was very low for every outcome because of very serious imprecision and serious indirectness. Conclusions Randomized evidence did not provide conclusive evidence of either increased or decreased suicidality with semaglutide, and GRADE certainty was very low for all outcomes. The posterior distribution for completed suicide leaned toward increased odds, whereas suicide attempt leaned toward decreased odds; both estimates were highly imprecise and compatible with clinically important effects in either direction. Continued active surveillance and adequately powered studies with systematic psychiatric ascertainment are warranted.

Background

Not reported in abstract.

Methods

Not reported in abstract.

Results

Not reported in abstract.

Interpretation

Not reported in abstract.

Limitations

Not reported in abstract.

Elsewhere in the Semaglutide corpus

DGLP-1s and criminality: US trial will test whether semaglutide can fight crime.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2026—DThe pharmacotherapy for pediatric obesity: insights and challenges from adult weight-loss medications.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2026 · Not reported in abstract.reviewBCardiovascular outcomes with tirzepatide versus semaglutide in type 2 diabetes.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2026 · n=271685 · 4.6% primary composite outcome incidence in tirzepatide group vs. 5.5% in semaglutide group, ARD -0.9%, 95% CI -1.01 to -0.77, HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.92─0.96.HumanBWeight-Loss Outcomes After Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Tirzepatide in a Minority Cohort With Severe Obesity: Results From a Propensity Score Matched Cohort.Clinical obesity · 2023 · 30% TWL and 12 kg/m² BMI reduction for SG at 12 months, p < 0.001.HumanBWeight loss with a lower dose compounded semaglutide and behavioral weight management program: A real-world matched retrospective cohort studybiorxiv-preprint · 2026 · At 16 weeks, NMGP users lost 8.3% of their baseline weight.HumanBSide effects of lower dose compounded semaglutide paired with a behavioral management program: A real-world retrospective studybiorxiv-preprint · 2026 · 34% lower relative odds of reporting GI side effects by week 16, p=0.001, n=2,481 per group.Human