Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 23 of 26Orforglipron (LY-3502970) literatureHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · Observational2023

Exploratory Cardiovascular Risk Modeling of Orforglipron Using the PREVENT Equations Compared with the Pooled Cohort Equations: A Post-Hoc Analysis from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The AHA PREVENT equations may offer a more comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular risk reduction from orforglipron compared to the older PCE. These projections should be validated with future cardiovascular outcomes trials.

Read at High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of HypertensionAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the orforglipron (ly-3502970) corpus
8
Preclinical
6
Observational · this one
1
Open-label
5
Randomised
6
Reviews

Summary and findings

This study compared the projected cardiovascular risk reduction from orforglipron using the 2013 Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) and the 2023 AHA PREVENT equations. The analysis involved hypothetical patient profiles and assessed risk reductions at doses of 12, 24, 36, and 45 mg. The findings indicated that the PREVENT equations projected larger relative risk reductions compared to the PCE.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
For a representative 50-year-old man with T2D, the PCE estimated a 10-year RRR of 16.8% at the 36 mg dose, while PREVENT projected an RRR of 31.4% at the same dose.2023

Abstract

The authors’ words, as High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension supplied them

<h4>Introduction</h4>Orforglipron, an oral non-peptide GLP-1 receptor agonist, improves multiple cardiometabolic risk factors. However, prior modeling used only the 2013 Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE), which ignore body mass index (BMI), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). We re-evaluated its cardiovascular benefit using the 2023 AHA PREVENT equations, which account for more nuanced variables.<h4>Aim</h4>To compare the projected cardiovascular risk reduction from orforglipron when modeled using the 2013 PCE versus the 2023 AHA PREVENT equations, and to quantify the additional exploratory cardiometabolic benefit captured by PREVENT's equations.<h4>Methods</h4>In this post-hoc analysis, we applied pooled effect estimates from our systematic review and meta-analysis of five orforglipron RCTs to representative hypothetical patient profiles. We calculated 10-year and 30-year Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk using the 2013 PCE and the 2023 PREVENT equations (base and HbA1c-enhanced models) at baseline and after modeled treatment effects at each dose (12, 24, 36, and 45 mg). Absolute and relative risk reductions were compared across tools. A sensitivity analysis was performed using the 95% confidence interval of the pooled treatment effects.<h4>Results</h4>In these modeled scenarios, the PREVENT HbA1c-enhanced model projected model-dependent relative risk reductions approximately 75-90% larger than those generated by the PCE across all patient profiles and dose tiers. For a representative 50-year-old man with T2D BMI 33 kg/m², HbA1c 8.0%, SBP 130 mmHg, TC 200 mg/dL, HDL 42 mg/dL, eGFR 85 mL/min/1.73 m²), the PCE estimated a 10-year RRR of 16.8% at the 36 mg dose, whereas PREVENT HbA1c-enhanced projected an RRR of 31.4% at the same dose-driven by additional capture of BMI reduction (- 2.6 kg/m²), HbA1c lowering (- 1.40%). Approximately one-third of the projected total risk reduction by PREVENT was attributable to HbA1c alone, a dimension the PCE structurally cannot assess. PREVENT also projected a 22.4% reduction in 10-year heart failure risk, a dimension absent from the PCE. PREVENT yielded lower baseline risk estimates than the PCE, consistent with known PCE overestimation. Notably, the PREVENT ASCVD-specific model projected reclassification of Profile A from borderline to low risk (< 5.0%) at all doses, whereas the PCE showed no reclassification from intermediate risk at any dose.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The AHA PREVENT equations may more comprehensively capture the projected cardiovascular benefit of orforglipron than the legacy PCE. In these modeled scenarios, exclusive reliance on the PCE may provide a less complete estimate of the projected cardiometabolic risk-factor benefit of orforglipron. For therapies targeting the cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic axis, PREVENT may offer a more comprehensive and clinically informative framework for estimating the cardiovascular benefit of orforglipron. Nevertheless, these projections remain model-derived and should be validated with individual patient data from future cardiovascular outcomes trials.

Background

This paper addresses the cardiovascular risk modeling of orforglipron, an oral non-peptide GLP-1 receptor agonist. Prior modeling utilized the 2013 Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE), which do not account for variables such as BMI, eGFR, and HbA1c. The study aims to evaluate whether the 2023 AHA PREVENT equations provide a more comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular benefits.

Methods

This post-hoc analysis applied pooled effect estimates from a systematic review and meta-analysis of five orforglipron RCTs. It utilized hypothetical patient profiles to calculate 10-year and 30-year cardiovascular disease risk using both the 2013 PCE and the 2023 PREVENT equations at doses of 12, 24, 36, and 45 mg. A sensitivity analysis was performed using the 95% confidence interval of the pooled treatment effects.

Results

The PREVENT HbA1c-enhanced model projected relative risk reductions approximately 75-90% larger than those generated by the PCE across all patient profiles and dose tiers. For a representative 50-year-old man with T2D, the PCE estimated a 10-year RRR of 16.8% at the 36 mg dose, while PREVENT projected an RRR of 31.4% at the same dose. The PREVENT model also indicated a 22.4% reduction in 10-year heart failure risk, absent from the PCE.

Interpretation

The findings suggest that the PREVENT equations may provide a more nuanced understanding of the cardiovascular benefits of orforglipron compared to the PCE. However, the effect sizes, while statistically significant, may not be clinically meaningful without further validation. Limitations include reliance on modeled data and the need for real-world validation.

Key findings

  • PREVENT HbA1c-enhanced model projected relative risk reductions approximately 75-90% larger than PCE across all patient profiles and dose tiers.
  • For a representative 50-year-old man with T2D, the PCE estimated a 10-year RRR of 16.8% at the 36 mg dose, while PREVENT projected an RRR of 31.4% at the same dose.
  • Approximately one-third of the projected total risk reduction by PREVENT was attributable to HbA1c alone.
  • PREVENT projected a 22.4% reduction in 10-year heart failure risk, which was absent from the PCE.
  • The PREVENT ASCVD-specific model projected reclassification of Profile A from borderline to low risk (< 5.0%) at all doses.

Limitations

  • Projections are model-derived and not based on real patient data.
  • Requires validation with individual patient data from future cardiovascular outcomes trials.

Elsewhere in the Orforglipron (LY-3502970) corpus

AEfficacy and safety of orforglipron 12 mg versus orforglipron 36 mg maintenance dose among patients with obesity with or without diabetes: a systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026 · n=3459 · Percentage body weight change p < 0.00001.reviewAPredicting the Long-Term Risk of Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease With Orforglipron in People With Overweight or Obesity: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ATTAIN-1 Trial.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026 · -48.6% to -59.4% relative reduction in T2D risk score vs placebo (-10.5%; p<0.0001; HR-range 0.43-0.55)HumanDOrforglipron and the Kidney: A Promise or Disappointment? The Need for Trials Examining Renal Outcomes.American journal of nephrology · Not reported in abstract.reviewCVariant-specific pharmacophoric shifts in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-orforglipron complexes revealed by Boltz-2 co-folding and membrane molecular dynamics.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2026 · G168S exhibited the strongest binding (-117.18 kcal/mol)In vitroBEfficacy and Safety of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Co-agonists for Weight Loss Among Adults Without Diabetes : An Updated Systematic Review.Annals of internal medicine · 2024 · n=25816 · -12.4% placebo-subtracted weight loss for orforglipron (95% CI, -15.1% to -9.7%)reviewALong-term safety of oral orforglipron in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (ACHIEVE-J): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group phase 3 trial.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2023 · n=401 · 339 participants (85%, 95% CI 80·7-87·8) had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE).Human