Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 22 of 26Orforglipron (LY-3502970) literatureInternational journal of biological macromolecules2026

Variant-specific pharmacophoric shifts in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor-orforglipron complexes revealed by Boltz-2 co-folding and membrane molecular dynamics.

The study reveals that GLP-1R variants can enhance orforglipron binding, but this does not guarantee effective pharmacological action, highlighting the need for further validation.

Read at International journal of biological macromoleculesAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the orforglipron (ly-3502970) corpus
8
Preclinical · this one
6
Observational
1
Open-label
5
Randomised
6
Reviews

Summary and findings

The study investigates how single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) affect the binding of orforglipron (ORF), an orally bioavailable GLP-1R agonist. It employs computational methods to analyze binding affinities and conformational changes in various receptor variants. The findings suggest that all variants showed enhanced binding compared to wild-type GLP-1R, with specific alterations in hydrogen-bond networks.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
G168S exhibited the strongest binding (-117.18 kcal/mol)2026

Abstract

The authors’ words, as International journal of biological macromolecules supplied them

<h4>Background</h4>Orforglipron (ORF), the first orally bioavailable non-peptide glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist to complete Phase 3 clinical trials, binds a distinct extracellular vestibule pocket not engaged by peptide GLP-1RAs. How commonly GLP-1R single-nucleotide polymorphisms alter this unique binding mode at the molecular level remains uncharacterized.<h4>Methods</h4>We employed an integrative computational framework that combines Boltz-2 deep learning co-folding for variant complex generation, 500 ns all-atom molecular dynamics simulations in a 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) lipid bilayer, MM/GBSA binding free-energy decomposition, and protein ligand hydrogen-bond occupancy analysis. Wild-type (WT) GLP-1R and four clinically annotated variants L260F<sup>3.53b</sup> (TM3), G168S (stalk), R131Q (ECD), and A316T<sup>5.46</sup> (TM5) were characterized.<h4>Results</h4>All variants exhibited enhanced MM/GBSA binding (24-35% vs WT) despite conformational destabilization, as evidenced by elevated RMSD, altered free energy landscapes, and reorganized H-bond networks. H-bond occupancy trajectory analysis identified Lys197<sup>2.67</sup> as the canonical pharmacophoric anchor in WT (79.8%), preserved in L260F (57.1%) and A316T (63.9%). However, Lys197<sup>2.67</sup> was absent in G168S and R131Q, which substitute Tyr205<sup>2.75</sup>/Gln221 and Tyr202, respectively. G168S exhibited the strongest binding (-117.18 kcal/mol) through compensatory contacts, while displaying a diffuse free-energy landscape and conformational disorder. A316T exhibited bistable dynamics related to Y242<sup>3.45</sup>-T316<sup>5.46</sup>H-bond-mediated constitutive activation, while preserving canonical engagement.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Binding energies and contact analysis describe variant-dependent ORF engagement. Binding enhancement alone is insufficient to characterize pharmacophoric quality. Lys197<sup>2.67</sup> occupancy differentiates variants with canonical binding from those substituting it, offering a structure-based framework for pharmacogenomic associations. The loss of Lys197<sup>2.67</sup> in G168S offers a testable structural hypothesis for the diminished glycemic response observed in carriers, which requires functional validation.

Background

This paper addresses the interaction of orforglipron (ORF) with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) variants, particularly how genetic variations may influence binding. Prior knowledge indicates that ORF is the first orally bioavailable non-peptide GLP-1R agonist, but the effects of single-nucleotide polymorphisms on its binding characteristics were not well understood. Understanding these interactions is critical for potential pharmacogenomic implications.

Methods

The study employed an integrative computational framework, including Boltz-2 deep learning for complex generation and 500 ns molecular dynamics simulations in a POPC lipid bilayer. It characterized wild-type GLP-1R and four variants: L260F, G168S, R131Q, and A316T. Primary outcome measures included MM/GBSA binding free-energy decomposition and hydrogen-bond occupancy analysis.

Results

All variants exhibited enhanced MM/GBSA binding (24-35% vs WT). G168S exhibited the strongest binding (-117.18 kcal/mol) with a diffuse free-energy landscape. Lys197<sup>2.67</sup> occupancy was 79.8% in WT, reduced in L260F and A316T, and absent in G168S and R131Q. The study noted conformational destabilization in variants, evidenced by elevated RMSD and altered free energy landscapes.

Interpretation

The findings suggest that while binding affinities are enhanced in GLP-1R variants, this does not necessarily correlate with pharmacophoric quality. The absence of Lys197<sup>2.67</sup> in certain variants indicates a potential mechanism for reduced efficacy in carriers, which requires further functional validation. The effect sizes observed may not be clinically meaningful without in vivo confirmation.

Key findings

  • All variants exhibited enhanced MM/GBSA binding (24-35% vs WT).
  • G168S exhibited the strongest binding (-117.18 kcal/mol).
  • Lys197<sup>2.67</sup> occupancy was preserved in L260F (57.1%) and A316T (63.9%).
  • Lys197<sup>2.67</sup> was absent in G168S and R131Q.
  • G168S displayed a diffuse free-energy landscape and conformational disorder.

Limitations

  • Computational modeling may not fully replicate in vivo conditions.
  • Single-site analysis limits generalizability.
  • No functional validation provided for binding hypotheses.

Elsewhere in the Orforglipron (LY-3502970) corpus

AEfficacy and safety of orforglipron 12 mg versus orforglipron 36 mg maintenance dose among patients with obesity with or without diabetes: a systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026 · n=3459 · Percentage body weight change p < 0.00001.reviewAPredicting the Long-Term Risk of Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease With Orforglipron in People With Overweight or Obesity: A Post Hoc Analysis of the ATTAIN-1 Trial.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026 · -48.6% to -59.4% relative reduction in T2D risk score vs placebo (-10.5%; p<0.0001; HR-range 0.43-0.55)HumanDOrforglipron and the Kidney: A Promise or Disappointment? The Need for Trials Examining Renal Outcomes.American journal of nephrology · Not reported in abstract.reviewBExploratory Cardiovascular Risk Modeling of Orforglipron Using the PREVENT Equations Compared with the Pooled Cohort Equations: A Post-Hoc Analysis from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023 · For a representative 50-year-old man with T2D, the PCE estimated a 10-year RRR of 16.8% at the 36 mg dose, while PREVENT projected an RRR of 31.4% at the same dose.reviewBEfficacy and Safety of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Co-agonists for Weight Loss Among Adults Without Diabetes : An Updated Systematic Review.Annals of internal medicine · 2024 · n=25816 · -12.4% placebo-subtracted weight loss for orforglipron (95% CI, -15.1% to -9.7%)reviewALong-term safety of oral orforglipron in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes (ACHIEVE-J): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group phase 3 trial.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2023 · n=401 · 339 participants (85%, 95% CI 80·7-87·8) had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE).Human