Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 26 of 27LL-37 literatureThe New England journal of medicine · RCTTop journal2026

Carbocisteine or Hypertonic Saline for Acute Respiratory Failure.

Neither carbocisteine nor hypertonic saline significantly reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients and both treatments were associated with adverse effects.

Read at The New England journal of medicineAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the ll-37 corpus
5
Preclinical
13
Observational
0
Open-label
5
Randomised · this one
4
Reviews

Summary and findings

This study evaluated the effects of carbocisteine and hypertonic saline on the duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure. Participants received usual care along with either carbocisteine (750 mg three times daily) or nebulized hypertonic saline (4 ml four times daily) for up to 28 days. The findings indicated that neither treatment significantly reduced mechanical ventilation duration and both were associated with adverse effects.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.90). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
Median duration of mechanical ventilation was 186.1 hours with carbocisteine and 172.7 hours with no carbocisteine, adjusted hazard ratio 0.96, P=0.34.2026

Abstract

The authors’ words, as The New England journal of medicine supplied them

<h4>Background</h4>Mucoactive agents are widely used in patients with acute respiratory failure despite limited evidence of their effectiveness or safety.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design that involved critically ill, mechanically ventilated participants 16 years of age or older with acute respiratory failure and difficult-to-clear secretions. All participants received usual care along with carbocisteine (750 mg three times daily enterally), 6% or 7% nebulized hypertonic saline (HTS) (4 ml four times daily), both interventions, or usual care alone for up to 28 days. The primary outcome was duration of mechanical ventilation (from randomization to first successful unassisted breathing). The primary comparisons were between any carbocisteine and no carbocisteine and between any HTS and no HTS, with each comparison comprising two treatment groups.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 1956 participants underwent randomization: 486 were assigned to carbocisteine, 485 to HTS, 492 to both treatments, and 493 to usual care alone (472, 474, 479, and 478, respectively, were included in the primary analysis). No evidence of treatment interaction was found (hazard ratio, 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.22; P = 0.91). The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 186.1 hours (95% CI, 168.3 to 196.6) with carbocisteine and 172.7 hours (95% CI, 165.2 to 190.4) with no carbocisteine (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.05; P = 0.34) and 184.5 hours (95% CI, 165.6 to 194.1) with HTS and 174.3 hours (95% CI, 166.9 to 192.7) with no HTS (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.10; P = 0.98). Clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred significantly more often with carbocisteine than with no carbocisteine (13 of 965 [1.4%] vs. 2 of 966 [0.2%]; risk ratio, 6.51; 95% CI, 1.47 to 28.76; P = 0.01). Bronchoconstriction leading to bronchodilator use occurred significantly more often with HTS than with no HTS (23 of 967 [2.4%] vs. 4 of 964 [0.4%]; risk ratio, 5.73; 95% CI, 1.99 to 16.52; P = 0.001), as did hypoxemia during nebulization (40 of 967 [4.1%] vs. 3 of 964 [0.3%]; risk ratio, 13.29; 95% CI, 4.12 to 42.83; P<0.001). One serious adverse reaction was reported in the combination group.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Among critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure, neither carbocisteine nor HTS significantly reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation, and each was associated with harm. (Funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme and the Belfast Health and Social Care Trust Charitable Trust Fund; MARCH ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN17683568.).

Background

Not reported in abstract.

Methods

Not reported in abstract.

Results

Not reported in abstract.

Interpretation

Not reported in abstract.

Limitations

Not reported in abstract.

Elsewhere in the LL-37 corpus

AAzithromycin for Preschoolers with Wheezing in the Emergency Department.The New England journal of medicine · 2026 · ADYC scores did not differ significantly between the azithromycin and placebo groups in the positive cohort (P = 0.70).HumanCRAD51 stabilizes neutrophil extracellular traps to compartmentalize inflammation.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026 · Not reported in abstract.AnimalD<em>In Vivo</em> Efficacy of LL-37 and Its Derivative Peptides Against Methicillin-Resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> in Animal Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysisbiorxiv-preprint · 2026 · -7.86 standardized mean difference in bacterial eradication vs controls, 95% CI: -9.40 to -6.33, P < 0.001, n=44.reviewAHigh-dose inhaled nitric oxide for severe pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria: a randomized controlled trial protocol.Annals of medicine · 2026 · Not reported in abstract.HumanBVaginitis testing outcomes by documented symptom status in a student-run free clinic: a retrospective study.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2026 · n=104 · Not reported in abstract.HumanDGlobal trends and molecular epidemiology of Azithromycin-resistant &lt;i&gt;Salmonella&lt;/i&gt;: A systematic review and meta-analysis.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026 · n=15514 · Pooled prevalence of azithromycin resistance among Salmonella isolates was 9.12% (95% CI: 6.53-12.07).review