Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 14 of 15Cagrilintide (AM833) literaturePharmacological research · Review2026

Beyond GLP-1: Amylin-Based Pharmacotherapy and the Search for Better-Tolerated Weight-Loss Drugs.

Amylin-based therapies like cagrilintide offer a promising approach to obesity treatment, but understanding their tolerability is key to enhancing clinical utility.

Read at Pharmacological researchAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the cagrilintide (am833) corpus
3
Preclinical
3
Observational
0
Open-label
3
Randomised
6
Reviews · this one

Summary and findings

The review discusses amylin-based pharmacotherapy as a strategy for obesity treatment, focusing on cagrilintide and other analogs. It highlights the distinct pharmacological mechanisms and receptor selectivity of these agents. The paper emphasizes the importance of understanding tolerability profiles to improve clinical utility.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
2026

Abstract

The authors’ words, as Pharmacological research supplied them

Amylin-based pharmacotherapy has re-emerged as a promising strategy for the treatment of obesity and metabolic disease with pharmacological and neural mechanisms distinct from incretin-based therapies. Amylin is a pancreatic β-cell hormone co-secreted with insulin that contributes to postprandial glucose regulation, slows gastric emptying, suppresses glucagon secretion, and promotes satiation through actions in the central nervous system. Recent advances in peptide engineering, lipidation, and reversible albumin binding have enabled the development of long-acting amylin-based agents, including cagrilintide, eloralintide, petrelintide and NN1213. These therapies differ in their pharmacokinetic properties and receptor selectivity, ranging from more selective amylin receptor agonists to dual amylin/calcitonin receptor agonists. This distinction may be critical for understanding both efficacy and tolerability, as calcitonin receptor engagement, exposure kinetics, and downstream neural circuit recruitment may influence whether reduced food intake reflects physiological satiation or aversive signaling. In this review, we summarize the biology of amylin signaling, the historical development of amylin-based therapeutics, and the emerging clinical landscape of long-acting amylin analogs. We place particular emphasis on the tolerability profile of this drug class and discuss how receptor pharmacology, hindbrain and parabrachial circuitry, species differences, and pharmacokinetic exposure may shape nausea, malaise, and emesis. Understanding how amylin-based therapies dissociate weight-loss efficacy from gastrointestinal intolerance may guide the rational design of next-generation anti-obesity drugs with improved clinical utility.

Background

Amylin-based pharmacotherapy is being explored as a treatment for obesity and metabolic diseases due to its distinct mechanisms compared to incretin-based therapies. Amylin, a hormone co-secreted with insulin, plays a role in glucose regulation and appetite suppression. This study is significant as it reviews the development and potential of long-acting amylin analogs, which may offer better tolerability and efficacy in weight management.

Methods

Not reported in abstract.

Results

Not reported in abstract.

Interpretation

The review suggests that understanding the pharmacological distinctions and receptor selectivity of amylin-based therapies is crucial for improving their clinical utility. While the potential for better-tolerated weight-loss drugs is promising, the lack of new experimental data limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions about clinical efficacy. The emphasis on tolerability profiles highlights the need for further research to dissociate weight-loss effects from gastrointestinal side effects.

Key findings

  • Amylin is co-secreted with insulin and regulates postprandial glucose.
  • Cagrilintide and other analogs have distinct pharmacokinetic properties.
  • Receptor selectivity may influence efficacy and tolerability.
  • Calcitonin receptor engagement affects food intake signaling.
  • The review emphasizes tolerability profiles of amylin-based drugs.

Limitations

  • Review article, no new data
  • Focus on theoretical considerations
  • Lacks quantitative findings
  • No direct clinical trial data

Elsewhere in the Cagrilintide (AM833) corpus

AAmylin-based obesity therapy: a meta-analysis of Cagrilintide and CagriSema versus placebo.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026 · n=5425 · -6.08% body weight, -5.89 kg with Cagrilintide monotherapyreviewAEfficacy and safety of zalfermin co-administered with semaglutide in participants with fibrosis and cirrhosis due to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: a phase 2, dose-ranging, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023 · n=698 · 24 [24%] of 99 participants in the zalfermin 30 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg group improved in liver fibrosis vs 16 [16%] of 100 participants in the placebo group; p=0·19.HumanCDistinct brain regions mediate regulation of food intake in response to GIPR agonism or antagonism.Nature metabolism · 2023 · Not reported in abstract.AnimalAEfficacy of CagriSema for Reaching Anthropometric Treatment Targets and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Secondary, Post hoc Analysis of REDEFINE 1.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2023 · 30.3% achieved BMI < 27 kg/m² and WHtR < 0.53 with CagriSema at week 68.HumanDCagrilintide-semaglutide: a new option for patients with type 2 diabetes.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2026ACagrilintide-semaglutide (CagriSema) versus semaglutide or cagrilintide in people with type 2 diabetes (REIMAGINE 2): a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2024 · n=2713 · Mean HbA1c change was significantly greater with cagrilintide-semaglutide (2.4 mg each) versus semaglutide 2.4 mg (-1.91 percentage points vs -1.75 percentage points; p=0.0035).Human