Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 13 of 15Cagrilintide (AM833) literatureThe lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · RCT · Phase 2Top journal2023

Efficacy and safety of zalfermin co-administered with semaglutide in participants with fibrosis and cirrhosis due to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: a phase 2, dose-ranging, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

The combination of zalfermin and semaglutide did not significantly improve liver fibrosis compared to placebo in this study, while semaglutide alone showed a nominally significant effect.

Read at The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatologyAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the cagrilintide (am833) corpus
3
Preclinical
3
Observational
0
Open-label
3
Randomised · this one
6
Reviews

Summary and findings

This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of zalfermin co-administered with semaglutide in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and clinically significant fibrosis. Participants received various doses of zalfermin and semaglutide for 52 weeks. The study found no significant improvement in liver fibrosis with zalfermin plus semaglutide compared to placebo.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
24 [24%] of 99 participants in the zalfermin 30 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg group improved in liver fibrosis vs 16 [16%] of 100 participants in the placebo group; p=0·19.n=698Phase 22023

Abstract

The authors’ words, as The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology supplied them

<h4>Background</h4>This phase 2 study evaluated once-weekly zalfermin and semaglutide for efficacy and safety in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and clinically significant fibrosis, including patients with compensated cirrhosis (F4c).<h4>Methods</h4>This proof-of-concept, phase 2, dose-ranging, double-blind, randomised controlled trial was done in 187 clinical trial sites in Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, India, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Türkiye, and the USA. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older with histological confirmation of steatohepatitis on liver biopsy (baseline or historical within 180 days). Eligible participants had clinically significant fibrosis (stage F2-F4c) in the absence of decompensation. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous zalfermin 7·5 mg plus subcutaneous semaglutide 2·4 mg, zalfermin 15 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg, zalfermin 30 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg, zalfermin 30 mg, semaglutide 2·4 mg, cagrilintide 2·4 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg, or placebo only once a week for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was improvement in liver fibrosis on the NASH CRN fibrosis scale of at least one stage and no worsening of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis at week 52. Efficacy was assessed in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned participants) and safety was analysed in all participants who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of trial product or placebo. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05016882, and is completed.<h4>Findings</h4>Between Aug 31, 2021, and March 14, 2025, 2420 people were screened for inclusion. 178 withdrew before random assignment and 1544 were disqualified. 698 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to zalfermin 7·5 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg (n=99), zalfermin 15 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg (n=100), zalfermin 30 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg (n=99), zalfermin 30 mg (n=101), semaglutide 2·4 mg (n=100), cagrilintide 2·4 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg (n=99), or placebo (n=100). 441 (63%) of 698 participants were female and 257 (37%) were male. 484 (69%) of 698 participants were White and 172 (25%) were Asian. At week 52, the proportion of participants who had an improvement in liver fibrosis and no worsening of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis with zalfermin 30 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg was not significantly greater than with placebo (24 [24%] of 99 participants in the combination group vs 16 [16%] of 100 participants in the placebo group; estimated difference in responder proportions [EDP] 7·98, 95% CI -3·82 to 19·79; p=0·19). A nominally significantly greater proportion of participants in the semaglutide 2·4 mg group achieved this endpoint than in the placebo group (30 [30%] of 100 participants in the semaglutide group; EDP 14·05, 95% CI 1·88 to 26·23; p=0·024), but not in the zalfermin 30 mg group versus placebo (22 [22%] of 101 participants in the zalfermin group; 4·99, -6·51 to 16·49; p=0·39). Similarly, the proportions of participants achieving this endpoint in the two groups that combined lower doses of zalfermin with semaglutide 2·4 mg and in the exploratory group combining cagrilintide 2·4 mg with semaglutide 2·4 mg were not substantially different than with placebo. Adverse events were mostly non-serious and mild to moderate in severity. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal, reported in 79 (80%) of 99 participants in the zalfermin 30 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg group, 61 (60%) of 101 participants in the zalfermin 30 mg group, 73 (73%) of 100 participants in the semaglutide 2·4 mg group, and 51 (51%) of 100 participants in the placebo group. Serious adverse events were reported in seven (7%) participants in the zalfermin 30 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg group, 13 (13%) participants in the zalfermin 30 mg group, ten (10%) participants in the semaglutide 2·4 mg group, and five (5%) participants in the placebo group. Five deaths were reported in the trial, one of which was assessed as possibly related to study drug (heart failure, zalfermin 30 mg group).<h4>Interpretation</h4>In participants with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and clinically significant fibrosis, the combination of zalfermin 30 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg did not significantly increase the proportion of participants who had an improvement in liver fibrosis and no worsening of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis compared with placebo by week 52. However, a nominally significant treatment effect was observed for semaglutide 2·4 mg versus placebo. Semaglutide might be considered for further clinical assessment as a potential disease-modifying therapy in the F4c population.<h4>Funding</h4>Novo Nordisk.

Background

This study addresses the efficacy and safety of zalfermin in combination with semaglutide for patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and clinically significant fibrosis. Previous studies have indicated potential benefits of semaglutide in metabolic conditions, but the effects of zalfermin in this context were unclear. Understanding the combined effects of these agents could inform future treatment strategies for this patient population.

Methods

This was a phase 2, dose-ranging, double-blind, randomised controlled trial conducted across 187 clinical trial sites. A total of 698 participants aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed steatohepatitis and clinically significant fibrosis were enrolled. Participants received various combinations of zalfermin and semaglutide or placebo once weekly for 52 weeks, with the primary endpoint being improvement in liver fibrosis on the NASH CRN fibrosis scale.

Results

At week 52, the proportion of participants with improvement in liver fibrosis was 24% in the zalfermin 30 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg group compared to 16% in the placebo group, yielding a p-value of 0·19. A nominally significant difference was noted for the semaglutide 2·4 mg group, with 30% achieving the endpoint compared to placebo (p=0·024). Other combinations did not show significant differences compared to placebo.

Interpretation

The results indicate that zalfermin co-administered with semaglutide did not significantly improve liver fibrosis compared to placebo, suggesting limited clinical utility in this combination. The nominally significant effect observed with semaglutide alone may warrant further investigation. Limitations such as potential industry bias and the study's design may affect the reliability of these findings.

Key findings

  • 24 [24%] of 99 participants in the zalfermin 30 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg group improved in liver fibrosis vs 16 [16%] of 100 participants in the placebo group; p=0·19.
  • 30 [30%] of 100 participants in the semaglutide 2·4 mg group improved in liver fibrosis vs placebo; p=0·024.
  • 22 [22%] of 101 participants in the zalfermin 30 mg group improved in liver fibrosis vs placebo; p=0·39.
  • Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported in 79 (80%) of 99 participants in the zalfermin 30 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg group.
  • Serious adverse events were reported in seven (7%) participants in the zalfermin 30 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg group.

Limitations

  • Industry-funded by Novo Nordisk.
  • Sample size of 698 may limit generalizability.
  • Short follow-up of 52 weeks may not capture long-term effects.
  • Single-site and multi-country design may introduce variability.
  • Potential conflicts of interest due to funding sources.

Elsewhere in the Cagrilintide (AM833) corpus

AAmylin-based obesity therapy: a meta-analysis of Cagrilintide and CagriSema versus placebo.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026 · n=5425 · -6.08% body weight, -5.89 kg with Cagrilintide monotherapyreviewDBeyond GLP-1: Amylin-Based Pharmacotherapy and the Search for Better-Tolerated Weight-Loss Drugs.Pharmacological research · 2026reviewCDistinct brain regions mediate regulation of food intake in response to GIPR agonism or antagonism.Nature metabolism · 2023 · Not reported in abstract.AnimalAEfficacy of CagriSema for Reaching Anthropometric Treatment Targets and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Secondary, Post hoc Analysis of REDEFINE 1.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2023 · 30.3% achieved BMI < 27 kg/m² and WHtR < 0.53 with CagriSema at week 68.HumanDCagrilintide-semaglutide: a new option for patients with type 2 diabetes.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2026ACagrilintide-semaglutide (CagriSema) versus semaglutide or cagrilintide in people with type 2 diabetes (REIMAGINE 2): a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2024 · n=2713 · Mean HbA1c change was significantly greater with cagrilintide-semaglutide (2.4 mg each) versus semaglutide 2.4 mg (-1.91 percentage points vs -1.75 percentage points; p=0.0035).Human