Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 8 of 13AOD-9604 literatureDiabetologia · RCTHigh-impact journal2026

Metabolic and vascular outcomes after transition to the MiniMed 780G system in adults ≥65 years with type 1 diabetes: a randomised, single-centre study.

The MiniMed 780G system may improve glycaemic management in older adults with type 1 diabetes, but further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Read at DiabetologiaAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the aod-9604 corpus
1
Preclinical
7
Observational
1
Open-label
1
Randomised · this one
3
Reviews

Summary and findings

This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of the MiniMed 780G system in adults aged ≥65 years with type 1 diabetes. The primary endpoint was glycaemic management, measured by time in range. The study reported an increase in time in range from 57.4% at baseline to 79.7% at 12 months, p<0.001.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
Time in range increased from 57.4% at baseline to 79.7% at 12 months, p<0.001.2026

Abstract

The authors’ words, as Diabetologia supplied them

<h4>Aims/hypothesis</h4>Hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery systems are increasingly regarded as the preferred therapy for type 1 diabetes, although evidence in older adults remains limited. The aim of this randomised study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the MiniMed 780G system in individuals with type 1 diabetes aged ≥65 years, with HbA<sub>1c</sub><86 mmol/mol (10%), who were naive to this technology, with the primary endpoint based on glycaemic management (time in range). Vascular status and other glycaemic metrics were assessed as secondary outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>This single-centre, open labelled (outcome assessors were not masked), randomised, controlled, parallel-group trial enrolled 34 participants who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated randomisation schedule to either advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) therapy or control therapy (multiple daily injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion) and followed for 12 months.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty-nine participants completed the study. Baseline characteristics, including glycaemic metrics, were comparable across groups (p>0.05). The AHCL group demonstrated a rapid and sustained improvement in glycaemic management, with time in range increasing from 57.4% at baseline to 79.7% at 12 months (p<0.001), accompanied by reductions in hyperglycaemia as reflected by time above range and time above range 2 (nominal p<0.001; p<0.001), and with no increase in hypoglycaemia across time below range and time below range 2 (nominal p=0.463; p=1). Adjusted between-group differences favoured AHCL for time in range (15.7% [95% CI 8.6, 22.6]) and HbA<sub>1c</sub> (-5 mmol/mol; [95% CI -9.7, -0.4 mmol/mol] [-0.46%; -0.89%, -0.04%]). No serious adverse events or episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycaemia occurred. Post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia showed a shortening of time to maximal flow in the AHCL group, indicating a favourable numerical trend towards improved microvascular function (nominal p>0.05). Retinal vascular status assessed using artificial intelligence remained stable throughout follow-up in both eyes (nominal p=0.710 and p=0.563, respectively).<h4>Conclusions/interpretation</h4>The MiniMed 780G system appears effective for glycaemic management and safe for use in older adults with long-standing type 1 diabetes and a high burden of comorbidities. A non-statistically significant numerical tendency (p>0.05) in the improvement of vascular function that requires further confirmation was also observed.<h4>Trial registration</h4>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06207838.

Background

Not reported in abstract.

Methods

Not reported in abstract.

Results

Not reported in abstract.

Interpretation

Not reported in abstract.

Limitations

Not reported in abstract.

Elsewhere in the AOD-9604 corpus

BEvaluation of Computer-aided Detection for Identifying Missed Gastric Cancer After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.DEN open · 2023 · n=2324 · Per-lesion sensitivity for MGCs was 15.0% (9/60) for CADe and 13.8% (83/600) for endoscopist detection, p = 0.538.HumanBTranspapillary Placement of a Multihole Covered Metal Stent Using a 5.9-Fr Delivery System Through a Forward-viewing Endoscope in Malignant Biliary Obstruction With Type I Duodenal Stenosis.DEN open · 2026 · n=1 · Not reported in abstract.HumanBPrediction of structural glaucoma progression from baseline fundus photographs using deep learning: a retrospective multicentre study.The Lancet. Digital health · 2026 · n=13913 · Maximum AUC of 0·98 (95% CI 0·97-1·00) in internal validation across follow-up intervals (2-5 years).HumanBBalloon Enteroscopy-assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Choledocholithiasis in Situs Inversus Totalis With Billroth II Reconstruction: A Case Report and Literature Review.DEN open · 2023 · n=1 · Not reported in abstract.HumanBUnderestimation of Subserosal Invasion in Early Gastric Cancer-Like Advanced Gastric Carcinoma With Focal Enteroblastic Differentiation: A Case Report.DEN open · 2023 · n=1 · Subserosal invasion (pT3 [SS]) identified post-surgery.HumanDAdvances in tuberculosis diagnostics and biomarkers, 2020-26: scientific evidence, recommendations, gaps, and developmental priorities.The Lancet. Microbe · 2026review