Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 4 of 5Vilon (KE) literatureIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · Observational2024

Auditory Spatial Perception as a Function of Recreational Noise Exposure in Gen-Z Adults with Normal Hearing.

Recreational noise exposure may negatively impact spatial auditory perception in young adults, highlighting the need for awareness of noise-related risks.

Read at Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of IndiaAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the vilon (ke) corpus
0
Preclinical
5
Observational · this one
0
Open-label
0
Randomised
0
Reviews

Summary and findings

The study evaluated auditory spatial perception in 60 normal-hearing participants aged 18-30, comparing those with and without recreational noise exposure. The experimental group had at least 4 hours of daily noise exposure, while the control group had none. Significant differences in spatial perception errors were observed between the two groups.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
Not reported in abstract.n=602024

Abstract

The authors’ words, as Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India supplied them

The study aimed to evaluate auditory spatial perception in individuals with and without recreational noise exposure using Virtual Acoustic Space Identification. A standard group comparison design using purposive sampling was conducted on 60 normal-hearing participants aged 18-30. They were divided into experimental and control groups based on their scores on the recreational hearing habits questionnaire (CHAR). The experimental group was exposed to recreational noise for at least 4 h per day, while the control group had no noise exposure. The procedure involved the administration of Virtual Acoustic Space Identification (VASI) at 65 dB SPL. Spatial perception was measured at eight spatial percepts within the head. Based on the confusion matrix, accuracy scores, reaction time at each virtual location, and the overall VASI score were calculated. The results indicate a significant difference in Front errors and Front-as-back errors in the two groups; people with recreational noise exposure had more errors in these spatial percepts. This indicates the differential impact of recreational noise on auditory spatial perception. The differences observed in the test can be attributed to the complexity of the auditory spatial perception task, the stimulus and the better sensitivity of the VASI in detecting spatial deficits. Recreational noise exposure affects spatial auditory perception, emphasizing the importance of mitigating recreational noise-related risks for auditory spatial skills.

Background

This paper addresses the impact of recreational noise exposure on auditory spatial perception in young adults. Prior research has indicated that noise exposure can affect hearing abilities, but the specific effects on spatial perception are less understood. This study is significant as it explores these effects using a standardized assessment tool, Virtual Acoustic Space Identification (VASI).

Methods

A standard group comparison design was used with a purposive sampling of 60 participants aged 18-30. Participants were divided into an experimental group exposed to recreational noise for at least 4 hours per day and a control group with no noise exposure. The primary outcome measure was the accuracy of spatial perception assessed through VASI at 65 dB SPL.

Results

The study found a significant difference in Front errors and Front-as-back errors between the experimental and control groups, with p-values less than 0.05. Specific numeric findings were not reported in the abstract.

Interpretation

The results suggest that recreational noise exposure may negatively impact auditory spatial perception, which aligns with some prior studies indicating that noise can affect auditory processing. However, the clinical significance of the observed differences remains unclear, especially given the small sample size and potential confounding factors such as self-reported exposure. This implies a need for further research to establish the implications for auditory health.

Key findings

  • Significant difference in Front errors between groups, p<0.05.
  • Significant difference in Front-as-back errors between groups, p<0.05.
  • Participants with recreational noise exposure had more errors in spatial percepts.

Limitations

  • small sample size of n=60
  • self-reported recreational noise exposure may introduce bias
  • no long-term follow-up to assess durability of effects

Elsewhere in the Vilon (KE) corpus

BEvaluating Seismocardiography as a Non-Exercise Method for Estimating Maximal Oxygen Uptake.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023 · n=94 · CPET VO2MAX was 37.2 (8.6) mL/min/kg, n=94.HumanBHyoid bone-based sex discrimination among Egyptians using a multidetector computed tomography: discriminant function analysis, meta-analysis, and artificial intelligence-assisted study.Scientific reports · 2025 · n=300 · Accuracies of machine learning models ranged from 0.8667 to 0.933.HumanBHealthy microbiome-moving towards functional interpretation.GigaScience · Not reported in abstract.reviewCPeptides Regulating Proliferative Activity and Inflammatory Pathways in the Monocyte/Macrophage THP-1 Cell Line.PubMed · 2022 · Not reported in abstract.In vitro