Development of a theory-based provider-focused training to improve HPV vaccine recommendations for young adults.
Provider training on HPV vaccination for young adults received positive feedback, highlighting the need for clear communication and flexibility in training formats.
Where it sits
this study against the rest of the humanin corpusSummary and findings
This study aimed to gather provider feedback on education materials for HPV vaccine recommendations targeting young adults aged 18-26. Fifteen primary care providers participated in semi-structured interviews to review the draft training. Overall, feedback was favorable, with participants noting the training's usefulness and flexibility.
Abstract
In the United States (US), only 47% of young adults (18-26 y old) had initiated the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in 2022. Provider recommendation is the strongest predictor of HPV vaccination; however, limited studies have explored methods for training providers on making HPV vaccine recommendations to young adults. The purpose of this study was to obtain provider feedback on education materials for effective HPV vaccination recommendations to patients ages 18-26. Guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model, an HPV vaccine training was developed for primary care providers. Fifteen US primary care providers were recruited in 2022 for semi-structured interviews. Participants reviewed and provided feedback on the draft training. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Overall, feedback on the education materials was favorable. Participants noted learning new and useful information and appreciated the diversity of people throughout the training. General feedback included flexibility in the training format and timing due to busy schedules and providing incentives to encourage participation. There were mixed feelings toward participating in a role-play activity. Recommendations included using clear language and opportunities to make the training more persuasive. Future research is needed to refine the intervention based on provider suggestions and test the effectiveness of the intervention for improving provider recommendations for young adults.
Background
This paper addresses the challenge of improving HPV vaccination rates among young adults, where only 47% had initiated the vaccine in 2022. Provider recommendations are identified as a critical factor influencing vaccination uptake. Prior studies have shown that effective communication from healthcare providers can enhance vaccination rates, but limited research exists on training methods for providers specifically targeting young adults.
Methods
The study utilized a qualitative design involving semi-structured interviews with 15 primary care providers recruited in 2022. The training was developed based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and Health Belief Model. The primary outcome was provider feedback on the educational materials, analyzed through thematic analysis.
Results
Overall feedback on the education materials was favorable, with participants expressing appreciation for the diversity of content and the flexibility of the training format. Specific numeric findings were not reported in the abstract.
Interpretation
The findings suggest that while the training materials were well-received, the small sample size limits the generalizability of the results. The feedback indicates areas for improvement, such as clearer language and more persuasive training methods. However, without quantitative measures of effectiveness, it is difficult to assess the clinical significance of these recommendations.
Key findings
- 47% of young adults (18-26 y old) had initiated the HPV vaccine in 2022.
- Fifteen US primary care providers were recruited for semi-structured interviews in 2022.
- Participants noted learning new and useful information.
- General feedback included flexibility in the training format and timing.
- Recommendations included using clear language and opportunities to make the training more persuasive.
Limitations
- small sample size of 15 providers
- qualitative feedback may not represent broader provider perspectives
- no quantitative measures of effectiveness reported
- study conducted in a single year