Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 25 of 29Semaglutide literaturebiorxiv-preprint · Observational2026

GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonism does not directly drive skeletal muscle atrophy or impair myogenesis in primary human myotubes

Direct GLP-1 and GIP receptor activation does not significantly affect muscle atrophy or myogenesis in human myotubes, suggesting that lean mass loss with these therapies may not be directly pharmacological.

Read at biorxiv-preprintAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the semaglutide corpus
7
Preclinical
16
Observational · this one
0
Open-label
2
Randomised
4
Reviews

Summary and findings

This study investigated the effects of semaglutide and GIP peptide on skeletal muscle myotubes derived from older adults with obesity. The primary focus was on atrophy-related gene expression, secretome changes, and myotube morphology. No significant alterations were observed in these parameters following treatment.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
Semaglutide reduced glycolytic and total ATP production rates, exact values not reported.2026

Abstract

The authors’ words, as biorxiv-preprint supplied them

GLP1 and GIP/GLP1 receptor agonists produce substantial weight loss in clinical trials but significant loss of lean body mass is reported. Whether this reflects a direct pharmacological effect on skeletal muscle or an indirect consequence of caloric restriction and reduced mechanical loading is unknown. Primary myoblasts were isolated from skeletal muscle of older adults with obesity undergoing orthopaedic surgery. GIPR and GLP1R expression was characterised by RTqPCR and flow cytometry. Differentiated myotubes were treated with semaglutide or GIP peptide and assessed for atrophy related gene expression (qPCR), secretome perturbation (Olink Reveal), mitochondrial and glycolytic bioenergetics (Seahorse XF Real Time ATP Rate Assay, glucose uptake, lactate secretion) and myotube morphology and myogenesis (immunofluorescence). GIPR mRNA was consistently detected across all donors; GLP1R mRNA was undetectable by PCR, though LUXendin645 flow cytometry identified low level surface GLP1R protein in 51 to 66% of myoblasts. Neither semaglutide nor GIP altered atrophy related gene expression or the secretome, with no proteins reaching significance. Semaglutide reduced glycolytic and total ATP production rates, accompanied by reduced lactate secretion, suggesting modest suppression of glycolytic flux; mitochondrial parameters were unaffected. Neither treatment impaired myotube thickness or differentiation; GIP increased myotube thickness after 8 days. Direct GLP1 and GIP receptor activation does not substantively perturb atrophic signalling, myogenesis, or the secretome of primary human skeletal muscle myotubes. These findings suggest that lean mass loss with incretin based therapies is unlikely to be driven by direct pharmacological action on skeletal muscle, particularly relevant as these agents are increasingly used in older adults at risk of sarcopenia.

Background

The study addresses the biological question of whether GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonism contributes to skeletal muscle atrophy or affects myogenesis, which is relevant given the increasing use of these agonists in metabolic disorders. Prior research has shown that these pathways can influence various metabolic processes, but their direct effects on muscle tissue remain unclear. Understanding these effects is crucial for evaluating the overall impact of GLP-1 and GIP therapies on muscle health.

Methods

The study utilized primary human myotubes to assess the direct effects of GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonism. Specific details regarding the study design, sample size (n), doses administered, duration of exposure, and the primary versus secondary outcome measures were not reported in the abstract.

Results

Not reported in abstract.

Interpretation

Without specific numeric findings or effect sizes reported, it is challenging to compare these results to prior literature or assess the clinical significance of the findings. The lack of reported data limits the ability to draw conclusions about the implications for clinical practice. Potential confounds include the absence of detailed methodology and results, which could affect the reliability of the conclusions drawn.

Key findings

  • Not reported in abstract.

Limitations

  • Not reported in abstract.

Elsewhere in the Semaglutide corpus

DCagrilintide-semaglutide (CagriSema) versus semaglutide or cagrilintide in people with type 2 diabetes (REIMAGINE 2): a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2026DEfficacy and safety of once-weekly cagrilintide-semaglutide (CagriSema) in adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on diet and exercise (REIMAGINE 1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3a study.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2026D1-year outcomes of semaglutide, tirzepatide, and sleeve gastrectomy in obesity in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2026BComparison of lifestyle, surgery, and semaglutide for weight management in endometrial cancer: a prospective observational study.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2026 · sleeve gastrectomy group had a BMI reduction difference of 4.04 kg/m² compared to the semaglutide group, p < 0.05HumanBReal-World Study of Cardiac Remodeling on Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Therapy Using Longitudinal Echocardiographybiorxiv-preprint · 2026 · LV mass decreased from 198.4 ± 69.6 g to 176.6 ± 66.0 g in super-responders, p < 0.001.HumanBExenatide Is Associated with Superior Gastrointestinal Motility Slowing Among GLP-1 Receptor Agonistsbiorxiv-preprint · 2020 · n=20 · Prevalence of anti-constipation prescriptions increased from 11.09% to 18.62% in the exenatide cohort over 12 months, p=6.75×10⁻⁴.Human