Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 10 of 32VIP (Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide) literatureNatureTop journal2024

Cooperative thalamocortical circuit mechanism for sensory prediction errors.

This study highlights a neural circuit mechanism in mice that enhances responses to unexpected visual stimuli, but specific numeric data are not provided.

Read at NatureAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the vip (vasoactive intestinal polypeptide) corpus
7
Preclinical · this one
19
Observational
0
Open-label
2
Randomised
4
Reviews

Summary and findings

This study investigates the neural circuit mechanisms underlying sensory prediction errors in mouse primary visual cortex (V1). It identifies a thalamocortical disinhibitory circuit involving vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) interneurons that enhances responses to unexpected visual stimuli. No specific numeric findings or treatment claims are reported.

How much of this paper we could read: title only (0.30). The feed gave us little more than the title, so our summary is thin. This says nothing about the study's quality — read the source. What this means →
2024

Abstract

The authors’ words, as Nature supplied them

The brain functions as a prediction machine, utilizing an internal model of the world to anticipate sensations and the outcomes of our actions. Discrepancies between expected and actual events, referred to as prediction errors, are leveraged to update the internal model and guide our attention towards unexpected events<sup>1-10</sup>. Despite the importance of prediction-error signals for various neural computations across the brain, surprisingly little is known about the neural circuit mechanisms responsible for their implementation. Here we describe a thalamocortical disinhibitory circuit that is required for generating sensory prediction-error signals in mouse primary visual cortex (V1). We show that violating animals' predictions by an unexpected visual stimulus preferentially boosts responses of the layer 2/3 V1 neurons that are most selective for that stimulus. Prediction errors specifically amplify the unexpected visual input, rather than representing non-specific surprise or difference signals about how the visual input deviates from the animal's predictions. This selective amplification is implemented by a cooperative mechanism requiring thalamic input from the pulvinar and cortical vasoactive-intestinal-peptide-expressing (VIP) inhibitory interneurons. In response to prediction errors, VIP neurons inhibit a specific subpopulation of somatostatin-expressing inhibitory interneurons that gate excitatory pulvinar input to V1, resulting in specific pulvinar-driven response amplification of the most stimulus-selective neurons in V1. Therefore, the brain prioritizes unpredicted sensory information by selectively increasing the salience of unpredicted sensory features through the synergistic interaction of thalamic input and neocortical disinhibitory circuits.

Background

The paper addresses the biological question of how thalamocortical circuits process sensory prediction errors, which is a critical aspect of sensory perception and cognitive function. Previous research has established the importance of VIP in modulating neural activity, but the specific mechanisms in sensory prediction remain unclear. This study aims to elucidate these mechanisms, potentially contributing to the understanding of sensory processing disorders.

Methods

Not reported in abstract.

Results

Not reported in abstract.

Interpretation

Not reported in abstract.

Key findings

  • Not reported in abstract.

Limitations

  • Not reported in abstract.

Elsewhere in the VIP (Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide) corpus

BAtlas-Guided Cell-Specific Transcriptomics Identifies Pathway-Level Remodeling of Human Hypothalamic CRH Neurons in Opioid Use Disorderbiorxiv-preprint · 2026 · n=343819 · Nominal decrease in VIP, not quantified.HumanDBinary classification of sake acidity using excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy combined with multivariate analysis models.Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy · 2026 · n=100 · Accuracy 0.880.ASafety and efficacy of Meridian sinew tuina (MST) for post-surgical upper limb lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2026 · n=1114 · SMD = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.44 to 1.74; Z = 20.81; p < 0.0001; N = 924.reviewBAccuracy and feasibility of robot-assisted implant surgery in edentulous patients: A retrospective case series.Journal of dentistry · 2026 · n=15 · Mean linear deviations were 0.71 ± 0.23 mm at the implant neck and 0.74 ± 0.24 mm at the apex.HumanBPredictions and cross-center validation of IDH status and 1p/19q status in adult diffuse glioma with non-invasive magnetic resonance spectroscopy.Magnetic resonance letters · 2026 · n=268 · IDH prediction AUCs: 0.906 intra-center, 0.857 cross-center.HumanBExpression and Correlation Analysis of Neuropeptide Family Members in the Peripheral Blood of Patients with COVID-19.Current pediatric reviews · 2026 · ACE2 in non-COVID-19 and moderate COVID-19 groups was higher than that in severe groups (p=0.04; p=0.03, respectively).Human