Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 1 of 30Survodutide (BI 456906) literatureeuropepmc · RCT2025

An experimental medicine protocol for exploring the haemodynamic effects of dual agonism at the glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon receptor in healthy subjects.

In healthy males, co-infusion of glucagon and exenatide significantly increased heart rate and rate pressure product, but no changes were observed in blood pressure or cardiac output.

Read at europepmcAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the survodutide (bi 456906) corpus
4
Preclinical
10
Observational
3
Open-label
10
Randomised · this one
3
Reviews

Summary and findings

This study examined the acute haemodynamic effects of dual agonism at the GLP-1 and glucagon receptor in healthy male participants. Various doses of glucagon and exenatide were administered via intravenous infusion. The study found significant increases in heart rate and rate pressure product with certain combinations, but no changes in cardiac output or blood pressure.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
Co-infusion increased rate pressure product by 793 mmHg*bpm (95% CI 460-1127 mmHg*bpm, P < .001).2025

Abstract

The authors’ words, as europepmc supplied them

Aims Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucagon dual receptor agonists are in clinical development for a range of metabolic conditions, including type 2 diabetes and obesity. The cardiovascular actions at these receptors are well studied, but less is known about their combination. The aim was to explore the acute haemodynamic effects of dual agonism at the GLP-1 and glucagon receptor. Methods Healthy male participants attended randomized, saline-controlled intravenous infusion studies using glucagon (low, 25 ng/kg/min), glucagon (high, 50 ng/kg/min), exenatide (loading dose 50 ng/min for 30 min then 25 ng/min) and exenatide:glucagon co-infusion for 120 min in Part A (glucagon dose-comparison study) and 60 min in Part B (dual-agonism study). Results In Part A (n = 7, median age 21 years, interquartile range 21-32 years), glucagon (high) increased heart rate by 11 beats per minute (bpm) (95% confidence interval [CI] 4-17 bpm, P < .01). In Part B (n = 12, median age 24 years, interquartile range 22-26 years), exenatide increased heart rate by 4 bpm (95% CI 2-6 bpm, P < .001). Glucagon (low) increased heart rate by 4 bpm (95% CI 1-7 bpm, P < .001). Co-infusion of glucagon (low) and exenatide increased heart rate by 7 bpm (95% CI 4-9 bpm, P < .001) and the rate pressure product by 793 mmHg*bpm (95% CI 460-1127 mmHg*bpm, P < .001). There were no differences in cardiac output, blood pressure or heart rate variability. Conclusions In healthy males, exenatide and glucagon co-infusion acutely increases the rate pressure product, an indirect measure of cardiac work. This increase is driven by an increase in heart rate, rather than any change in systolic blood pressure.

Background

This paper addresses the haemodynamic effects of dual agonism at the glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucagon receptor, which is a topic of interest due to the potential implications for metabolic health. Prior research has indicated that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists can influence cardiovascular outcomes, but the specific effects of dual agonism remain underexplored. Understanding these effects in healthy subjects is crucial for assessing the safety and efficacy of Survodutide as a therapeutic agent.

Methods

The study design is an experimental medicine protocol involving healthy subjects. Specific details regarding the population, sample size (n), dose, duration, and route of administration were not reported in the abstract. Primary and secondary outcome measures were also not specified.

Results

Not reported in abstract.

Interpretation

Due to the lack of reported results and specific findings, it is difficult to compare this study's outcomes to prior literature or assess the clinical significance of any observed effects. Without clear data, the implications for practice remain uncertain, and potential confounds such as small sample size or lack of detailed methodology cannot be evaluated.

Key findings

  • Not reported in abstract.

Limitations

  • Not reported in abstract.

Elsewhere in the Survodutide (BI 456906) corpus

ASurvodutide Once Weekly in Adults with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.The New England journal of medicine · 2023 · n=752 · -8.2% weight change in the 3.6-mg group at week 76, n=250, 95% CI -9.2 to -7.2.HumanASurvodutide for the treatment of obesity: Mechanistic rationale, clinical evidence, and remaining uncertainties.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026 · 18.7% body-weight reduction at 46 weeks.reviewCNephroprotective Effects of the Dual GCGR/GLP-1R Agonist Survodutide in Hypertension-Accelerated Diabetic Kidney Disease.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026 · Not reported in abstract.AnimalASurvodutide Once Weekly in Adults with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.The New England journal of medicine · 2026 · -8.2% weight change in the 3.6-mg group at week 76, n=250, 95% CI -9.2 to -7.2HumanASurvodutide in adults with obesity and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: SYNCHRONIZE-MASLD, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.Nature medicine · 2026 · 84.2% of survodutide-treated patients versus 24.3% of placebo-treated patients had ≥30% reduction in LFC, P<0.0001.HumanASurvodutide Once Weekly for the Treatment of Adults with Obesity.The New England journal of medicine · 2026 · -12.2% mean change in body weight from baseline in the 3.6-mg group at week 76, 95% CI -13.6 to -10.8.Human