Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 23 of 23Cagrilintide (AM833) literaturebiorxiv-preprint · Meta-analysis

CagriSema 2.4/2.4 mg versus CagriSema 1.0/1.0 mg in adults with type 2 diabetes: a dose-comparison systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

CagriSema 2.4/2.4 mg resulted in greater weight loss than 1.0/1.0 mg, but the reduction was below the clinically meaningful threshold, and there was no significant benefit for HbA1c levels.

Read at biorxiv-preprintAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the cagrilintide (am833) corpus
3
Preclinical
4
Observational
0
Open-label
4
Randomised
12
Reviews · this one

Summary and findings

This study compared the efficacy and safety of cagrilintide–semaglutide (CagriSema) at two maintenance doses, 2.4/2.4 mg and 1.0/1.0 mg, in adults with type 2 diabetes. The primary outcomes included body weight reduction and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Results indicated a greater reduction in body weight with the higher dose but no statistically significant difference in HbA1c levels.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
Mean difference in body weight reduction was −2.07 pp; 95% CI −2.91 to −1.24.

Abstract

The authors’ words, as biorxiv-preprint supplied them

<h4>Background</h4> Once-weekly cagrilintide–semaglutide (CagriSema) has been evaluated at two maintenance doses, 2.4/2.4 mg and 1.0/1.0 mg, in type 2 diabetes (T2DM), but they have not been directly compared. We compared their efficacy and safety. <h4>Methods</h4> We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing both doses. Contrasts derived from arm-level estimates were pooled using random-effects models. Primary outcomes were interpreted against prespecified minimally important differences (MIDs) of 3 percentage points (pp) for body weight and 0.3 pp (3.3 mmol/mol) for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). <h4>Results</h4> Three trials (1,506 participants) were included. CagriSema 2.4/2.4 mg produced a greater reduction in body weight (mean difference [MD] −2.07 pp; 95% confidence interval [CI] −2.91 to −1.24), with the entire CI below the MID, and higher proportions achieving reductions of ≥10% (64.9% vs. 55.1%) and ≥15% (41.9% vs. 30.9%). The difference in HbA1c was not statistically significant (MD −0.16 pp [−1.7 mmol/mol]; 95% CI −0.43 to 0.10 [−4.7 to 1.1 mmol/mol]). The higher dose increased gastrointestinal disorders (64.8% vs. 53.2%; risk ratio 1.22; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.32), without differences in serious adverse events or adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. Certainty of evidence was high for body weight and moderate for HbA1c. <h4>Conclusions</h4> CagriSema 2.4/2.4 mg provided additional weight loss smaller than the MID, no clear HbA1c benefit, and more gastrointestinal adverse events than 1.0/1.0 mg, supporting individualized dose selection. <h4>Registration</h4> CRD420261545958 (registered 10/21/2026).

Background

Not reported in abstract.

Methods

Not reported in abstract.

Results

Not reported in abstract.

Interpretation

Not reported in abstract.

Limitations

Not reported in abstract.

Elsewhere in the Cagrilintide (AM833) corpus

AEfficacy and Safety of CagriSema in Type 2 Diabetes: A Dose- and Comparator-Specific Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2023 · n=4554 · -1.87 percentage points HbA1c reduction vs placebo (95% CrI, -2.08 to -1.62)reviewCContinued CagriSema treatment preserves weight loss by reducing energy intake and maintaining energy expenditure in rats.Molecular metabolism · 2026 · CS reduced energy intake (EI) and preserved total energy expenditure (EE), explaining 86% and 14% of weight loss efficacy respectively.AnimalADesign and baseline characteristics of the CagriSema cardiovascular outcomes trial (REDEFINE 3).American heart journal · 2026 · n=7076 · 7076 adults randomized between 1/2023-12/2024.HumanAWeight Loss, Obesity Medication, and Risk of Obesity-Associated Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2026 · n=40731 · Coagonists RR=0.43, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.97reviewABenefits and Harms of Pharmacologic Treatments in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: A Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis for the American College of Physicians.Annals of internal medicine · 2026 · n=112511 · 112,511 participants across 69 studies.reviewAMaximizing weight loss with cagrisema: a systematic review and GRADE-assessed meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026 · n=8069 · MD = -13.99 kg vs placebo; 95% CI = -18.38 to -9.61; p < 0.00001review