A bibliometric analysis of global health curriculum teaching models: Current status, hotspots, and trends in higher education between 2014 and 2024.
Global health curriculum publications have risen significantly, but participation from Global South institutions remains low, highlighting ongoing inequities in global health education.
Where it sits
this study against the rest of the ghrp-6 corpusSummary and findings
This study performed a bibliometric analysis of 209 studies on global health curriculum teaching models published between 2014 and 2024. The analysis aimed to map the status, identify hotspots, and capture key trends in global health education. It was found that the number of publications increased from 9 in 2014 to 38 in 2020, with the United States leading in publication volume.
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>As global health challenges become increasingly complex, understanding the dynamic evolution of teaching models in higher education is critical. This study aims to employ bibliometric methods to map the status, identify hotpots, and capture key trends in global health curriculum design over the past decade.<h4>Methods</h4>Utilizing CiteSpace 6.4.R1, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis was conducted on 209 studies focusing on global health curriculum teaching models, indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection between 2014 and 2024. Articles and reviews published in English were retrieved using a structured search strategy combining four keyword domains: "Global Health", "Curriculum", "Teaching Model", and "Higher Education". The analysis comprised performance analysis and science mapping techniques, including co-authorship analysis, Global North-South collaboration assessment, co-citation analysis, keyword co-occurrence and clustering, and burst detection to identify emerging research fronts.<h4>Results</h4>Global health education has experienced rapid development over the past decade, with the number of publications increasing from 9 in 2014 to 38 in 2020, and maintaining a relatively high level since then. Developed countries, particularly the United States, are leading the field in terms of publication volume (n = 121, 57.9%), while Global South institution's participation remained limited (28.9%). North-South collaborations were uneven, with 77.6% of curricula incorporating collaborative development elements but only 57.9% reflecting co-authorship partnerships in transnational studies. According to the co-occurrence analyses of keywords, the most frequently occurring teaching models are "Interprofessional learning" (n = 9), "Competency-based education" (n = 8), "Online learning" (n = 7), "Experiential learning" (n = 4) and "Community-engaged learning" (n = 4).<h4>Conclusion</h4>This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of global health curriculum teaching models, highlighting key developments and trends. The field has advanced markedly but reflects persistent inequities in knowledge production and resource allocation. Future efforts must prioritize equitable North-South collaboration, culturally adapted competency frameworks, and inclusive technological integration to foster a globally representative workforce capable of addressing interconnected health challenges. Moving forward, global health education should embrace dynamic, forward-thinking approaches to prepare a versatile workforce capable of tackling both current and future global health challenges.
Background
Not reported in abstract.
Methods
Not reported in abstract.
Results
Not reported in abstract.
Interpretation
Not reported in abstract.
Key findings
- Not reported in abstract.
- Not reported in abstract.
- Not reported in abstract.
Limitations
- Not reported in abstract.
- Not reported in abstract.
- Not reported in abstract.