Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 7 of 14DNSP-11 (Dopamine Neuron Stimulating Peptide-11) literatureeuropepmc · Observational · Preclinical2013

A synthetic five amino acid propeptide increases dopamine neuron differentiation and neurochemical function.

DNSP-5 significantly increased dopamine levels in rat models, but its clinical relevance to human neurodegenerative diseases remains unclear.

Read at europepmcAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the dnsp-11 (dopamine neuron stimulating peptide-11) corpus
1
Preclinical
13
Observational · this one
0
Open-label
0
Randomised
0
Reviews

Summary and findings

This study investigates the effects of the five amino acid peptide dopamine neuron stimulating peptide-5 (DNSP-5) on dopaminergic neuron differentiation and function in vitro and in vivo. The peptide was administered at various doses, including a unilateral treatment of 30 μg in rats, and resulted in significant increases in dopamine levels. No therapeutic claims are made.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
Approximately 66% increase in extracellular DA levels compared to vehicle.Preclinical2013

Abstract

The authors’ words, as europepmc supplied them

A major consequence of Parkinson's disease (PD) involves the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (SN) and a subsequent loss of dopamine (DA) in the striatum. We have shown that glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) shows robust restorative and protective effects for DA neurons in rats, non-human primates and possibly in humans. Despite GDNF's therapeutic potential, its clinical value has been questioned due to its limited diffusion to target areas from its large size and chemical structure. Several comparatively smaller peptides are thought to be generated from the prosequence. A five amino-acid peptide, dopamine neuron stimulating peptide-5 (DNSP-5), has been proposed to demonstrate biological activity relevant to neurodegenerative disease. We tested the in vitro effects of DNSP-5 in primary dopaminergic neurons dissected from the ventral mesencephalon of E14 Sprague Dawley rat fetuses. Cells were treated with several doses (0.03, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0 ng/mL) of GDNF, DNSP-5, or an equivalent volume of citrate buffer (vehicle). Morphological features of tyrosine hydroxylase positive neurons were quantified for each dose. DNSP-5 significantly increased (p < 0.001) all differentiation parameters compared to citrate vehicle (at one or more dose). For in vivo studies, a unilateral DNSP-5 treatment (30 μg) was administered directly to the SN. Microdialysis in the ipsilateral striatum was performed 28 days after treatment to determine extracellular levels of DA and its primary metabolites (3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and homovanillic acid). A single treatment significantly increased (~66%) extracellular DA levels compared to vehicle, while DA metabolites were unchanged. Finally, the protective effects of DNSP-5 against staurosporine-induced cytotoxicity were investigated in a neuronal cell line showing substantial protection by DNSP-5. Altogether, these studies strongly indicate biological activity of DNSP-5 and suggest that DNSP-5 has neurotrophic-like properties that may be relevant to the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases like PD.

Background

The paper addresses the differentiation of dopamine neurons, which is crucial for understanding various neurological conditions. Previous research has indicated that neuropeptides can influence neuronal development, but the specific role of DNSP-11 had not been established. This study aims to fill that gap by examining how DNSP-11 affects dopamine neuron differentiation and function.

Methods

The study employed a rodent model to assess the effects of DNSP-11 on dopamine neurons. Specific details regarding the sample size, dosing regimen, duration of treatment, and outcome measures are not reported in the abstract.

Results

Not reported in abstract.

Interpretation

Without specific numeric data, it is challenging to compare these findings to existing literature or assess the clinical significance of the results. The lack of detailed outcomes limits the ability to draw firm conclusions about the implications for practice. Additionally, the rodent model may not fully represent human responses.

Key findings

  • Not reported in abstract.

Limitations

  • Not reported in abstract.
  • Rodent model may not translate to humans.
  • Specific numeric findings not provided.

Elsewhere in the DNSP-11 (Dopamine Neuron Stimulating Peptide-11) corpus

CMutations in feline infectious peritonitis virus nonstructural protein 14/16 methyltransferase attenuate the pathogenicity of the virus in cats.Journal of virology · 2025 · 75% reduction in mortality compared to wild type.AnimalBTailoring malaria control interventions to suit local context: codesign of perennial malaria chemoprevention (PMC) programmes through the Plus Project.BMJ global health · 2024 · Not reported in abstract.reviewBThe influence of public health organization on response to the COVID-19 pandemic in four Canadian provinces: A comparative qualitative analysis.Health policy OPEN · 2025 · n=103 · Not reported in abstract.reviewBExploring drug coverage variability within districts: A CES approach to investigate treatment gaps in Mozambique's schistosomiasis program.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023 · Effective programmatic coverage (≥75%) achieved with 95% confidence in five districts.reviewBChallenges and opportunities to addressing non-communicable diseases after climate-related disasters in Mozambique: a qualitative study.BMJ global health · 2026 · n=36 · Not reported in abstract.HumanCComparison of short nasal swab and deep nasopharyngeal swab sampling methods to describe BRD-associated viruses and bacteria detected using a metagenomics approach optimized for virus recovery in fall-placed beef calves shortly after feedlot arrival.Veterinary and animal science · 2026 · n=150 · mean reads for BCoV: 75 vs 17; OR = 21.4, p = 0.001Animal