Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 23 of 38Orforglipron (LY-3502970) literatureHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · Observational2023

Exploratory Cardiovascular Risk Modeling of Orforglipron Using the PREVENT Equations Compared with the Pooled Cohort Equations: A Post-Hoc Analysis from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The AHA PREVENT equations may offer a more accurate assessment of cardiovascular risk reduction from orforglipron compared to the older PCE, but these findings need validation with real patient data.

Read at High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of HypertensionAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the orforglipron (ly-3502970) corpus
12
Preclinical
8
Observational · this one
1
Open-label
10
Randomised
7
Reviews

Summary and findings

This study modeled the cardiovascular risk reduction from orforglipron using the 2023 AHA PREVENT equations compared to the 2013 Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE). It involved hypothetical patient profiles and assessed various doses, reporting significant differences in projected risk reductions. The findings suggest that the PREVENT equations may offer a more comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular benefits than the PCE.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
For a representative 50-year-old man with T2D at the 36 mg dose, PCE estimated a 10-year RRR of 16.8%, while PREVENT projected an RRR of 31.4%.2023

Abstract

The authors’ words, as High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension supplied them

Introduction Orforglipron, an oral non-peptide GLP-1 receptor agonist, improves multiple cardiometabolic risk factors. However, prior modeling used only the 2013 Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE), which ignore body mass index (BMI), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). We re-evaluated its cardiovascular benefit using the 2023 AHA PREVENT equations, which account for more nuanced variables. Aim To compare the projected cardiovascular risk reduction from orforglipron when modeled using the 2013 PCE versus the 2023 AHA PREVENT equations, and to quantify the additional exploratory cardiometabolic benefit captured by PREVENT's equations. Methods In this post-hoc analysis, we applied pooled effect estimates from our systematic review and meta-analysis of five orforglipron RCTs to representative hypothetical patient profiles. We calculated 10-year and 30-year Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk using the 2013 PCE and the 2023 PREVENT equations (base and HbA1c-enhanced models) at baseline and after modeled treatment effects at each dose (12, 24, 36, and 45 mg). Absolute and relative risk reductions were compared across tools. A sensitivity analysis was performed using the 95% confidence interval of the pooled treatment effects. Results In these modeled scenarios, the PREVENT HbA1c-enhanced model projected model-dependent relative risk reductions approximately 75-90% larger than those generated by the PCE across all patient profiles and dose tiers. For a representative 50-year-old man with T2D BMI 33 kg/m², HbA1c 8.0%, SBP 130 mmHg, TC 200 mg/dL, HDL 42 mg/dL, eGFR 85 mL/min/1.73 m²), the PCE estimated a 10-year RRR of 16.8% at the 36 mg dose, whereas PREVENT HbA1c-enhanced projected an RRR of 31.4% at the same dose-driven by additional capture of BMI reduction (- 2.6 kg/m²), HbA1c lowering (- 1.40%). Approximately one-third of the projected total risk reduction by PREVENT was attributable to HbA1c alone, a dimension the PCE structurally cannot assess. PREVENT also projected a 22.4% reduction in 10-year heart failure risk, a dimension absent from the PCE. PREVENT yielded lower baseline risk estimates than the PCE, consistent with known PCE overestimation. Notably, the PREVENT ASCVD-specific model projected reclassification of Profile A from borderline to low risk (< 5.0%) at all doses, whereas the PCE showed no reclassification from intermediate risk at any dose. Conclusions The AHA PREVENT equations may more comprehensively capture the projected cardiovascular benefit of orforglipron than the legacy PCE. In these modeled scenarios, exclusive reliance on the PCE may provide a less complete estimate of the projected cardiometabolic risk-factor benefit of orforglipron. For therapies targeting the cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic axis, PREVENT may offer a more comprehensive and clinically informative framework for estimating the cardiovascular benefit of orforglipron. Nevertheless, these projections remain model-derived and should be validated with individual patient data from future cardiovascular outcomes trials.

Background

This paper addresses the cardiovascular risk modeling of orforglipron, an oral non-peptide GLP-1 receptor agonist. Prior modeling utilized the 2013 Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE), which do not account for variables such as BMI, eGFR, and HbA1c. The study aims to evaluate whether the 2023 AHA PREVENT equations provide a more comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular benefits.

Methods

This post-hoc analysis applied pooled effect estimates from a systematic review and meta-analysis of five orforglipron RCTs. It utilized hypothetical patient profiles to calculate 10-year and 30-year cardiovascular disease risk using both the 2013 PCE and the 2023 PREVENT equations at doses of 12, 24, 36, and 45 mg. A sensitivity analysis was performed using the 95% confidence interval of the pooled treatment effects.

Results

The PREVENT HbA1c-enhanced model projected relative risk reductions approximately 75-90% larger than those generated by the PCE across all patient profiles and dose tiers. For a representative 50-year-old man with T2D, the PCE estimated a 10-year RRR of 16.8% at the 36 mg dose, while PREVENT projected an RRR of 31.4% at the same dose. The PREVENT model also indicated a 22.4% reduction in 10-year heart failure risk, absent from the PCE.

Interpretation

The findings suggest that the PREVENT equations may provide a more nuanced understanding of the cardiovascular benefits of orforglipron compared to the PCE. However, the effect sizes, while statistically significant, may not be clinically meaningful without further validation. Limitations include reliance on modeled data and the need for real-world validation.

Key findings

  • PREVENT HbA1c-enhanced model projected relative risk reductions approximately 75-90% larger than PCE across all patient profiles and dose tiers.
  • For a representative 50-year-old man with T2D, the PCE estimated a 10-year RRR of 16.8% at the 36 mg dose, while PREVENT projected an RRR of 31.4% at the same dose.
  • Approximately one-third of the projected total risk reduction by PREVENT was attributable to HbA1c alone.
  • PREVENT projected a 22.4% reduction in 10-year heart failure risk, which was absent from the PCE.
  • The PREVENT ASCVD-specific model projected reclassification of Profile A from borderline to low risk (< 5.0%) at all doses.

Limitations

  • Projections are model-derived and not based on real patient data.
  • Requires validation with individual patient data from future cardiovascular outcomes trials.

Elsewhere in the Orforglipron (LY-3502970) corpus

AEfficacy and safety of oral orforglipron in Japanese participants with obesity disease (ATTAIN-J): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 trial.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2026 · Mean percentage change in bodyweight was -5.9% with orforglipron 6 mg, -8.7% with 12 mg, and -7.9% with 36 mg, compared with -0.6% with placebo (all p<0.0001).HumanAEfficacy and safety of orforglipron in adults with body mass index of 27 to less than 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and adiposity-related complications: A post hoc analysis of the ATTAIN-1 trial.Obesity pillars · 2026 · n=260 · At Week 72, orforglipron 17.2 mg was associated with a mean percent body weight reduction of -13.5% versus placebo at -0.3%, nominal p < 0.001.HumanDOrforglipron for Type 2 Diabetes and Pancreatic Risk Assessment.JAMA · 2026—DOrforglipron for Type 2 Diabetes and Pancreatic Risk Assessment-Reply.JAMA · 2026—DEstablishing cardiovascular safety of the small-molecule GLP-1 receptor agonist orforglipron in type 2 diabetes.Lancet (London, England) · 2026—AQualitative Exit Interviews to Characterize the Positive Treatment Experiences of Patients in the Phase III Trial of Orforglipron Versus Oral Semaglutide for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes.The patient · 2023 · n=60 · Patients reduced glycated hemoglobin by 1.6% (SD = 1.3) from a baseline of 8.3%.Human