Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 23 of 28Leuprorelin literatureJournal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · Review2026

Peptide Therapeutics for Solid Tumors: Functional Classes, AI-Enhanced Discovery and Clinical Advances.

Peptide therapeutics show potential in treating solid tumors, with AI enhancing their design and discovery.

Read at Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide SocietyAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the leuprorelin corpus
3
Preclinical
16
Observational
1
Open-label
5
Randomised
3
Reviews · this one

Summary and findings

This review discusses advancements in peptide-based therapeutics for solid tumors from 2020 to 2025. It categorizes peptide agents into five functional classes and highlights the role of AI in peptide design. Clinical trial outcomes of peptide drugs in solid tumors are also discussed.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
2026

Abstract

The authors’ words, as Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society supplied them

Solid tumors, the most prevalent form of malignancy, pose therapeutic challenges distinct from hematologic malignancies due to their complex biology, including high tumor heterogeneity, a dense extracellular matrix (ECM), an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), and multifaceted drug resistance. Peptide drugs have emerged as a focal point in precision oncology, combining the deep tissue penetration of small molecules with the high target specificity, low immunogenicity, and sequence designability of antibodies. This review systematically summarizes advancements in peptide-based therapeutics for solid tumors from 2020 to 2025. These agents are categorized by function into five classes: tumor-homing peptides, surface receptor antagonist/inhibitory peptides, interfering peptides, peptide vaccines, and cell-penetrating peptides as delivery tools. We also highlight the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in peptide design and discovery. Finally, we discuss outcomes from clinical trials of peptide drugs in solid tumors, underscoring their potential as multifunctional agents in this setting.

Background

Solid tumors are the most common form of cancer and present unique therapeutic challenges due to their complex biology, including high heterogeneity and drug resistance. Peptide therapeutics have emerged as a promising approach in precision oncology, offering advantages such as deep tissue penetration and high specificity. This review is significant as it compiles recent advancements in peptide-based treatments for solid tumors, providing insights into their potential roles in oncology.

Methods

This is a review article that systematically summarizes advancements in peptide-based therapeutics for solid tumors from 2020 to 2025. It categorizes peptide agents into five functional classes and discusses the role of AI in peptide design. The review also highlights outcomes from clinical trials of peptide drugs in this context.

Results

Not reported in abstract.

Interpretation

The review suggests that peptide therapeutics hold promise for treating solid tumors due to their multifunctional capabilities and specificity. However, the absence of specific quantitative data limits the ability to assess the clinical significance of these advancements. The role of AI in enhancing peptide design is noted as a significant development, potentially accelerating the discovery of effective treatments.

Key findings

  • Solid tumors present distinct therapeutic challenges due to complex biology.
  • Peptide drugs combine deep tissue penetration with high target specificity.
  • Five functional classes of peptide agents are identified.
  • AI plays a transformative role in peptide design and discovery.
  • Clinical trials underscore the potential of peptide drugs in solid tumors.

Limitations

  • Review article, no new experimental data.
  • Lacks specific quantitative outcomes.
  • Focuses on advancements rather than detailed trial results.
  • Potential publication bias in selected studies.

Elsewhere in the Leuprorelin corpus

BImproved Survival with Enzalutamide in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.The New England journal of medicine · 2026HumanDTransdermal Estradiol Patches in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer.The New England journal of medicine · 2026BMeningioma enlargement associated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist therapy: two cases and supporting in vitro evidence.Brain tumor pathology · 2023 · n=2 · Not reported in abstract.HumanBH&E to recurrence score: A step forward, but not yet a substitute for genomic testing.Translational oncology · 2026 · n=5000 · AUC of 0.898 for identifying recurrence score ≥26.reviewBDiagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer by supraclavicular lymph node excision in a patient with persistent macroscopic hematuria: A case report.Urology case reports · 2026 · n=1HumanCNovel GnRH analogue decorated paclitaxel and CQDs co-loaded theranostic zein nanoparticles for treatment of breast cancer: Formulation optimization, in vitro and in vivo evaluation.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2026 · Particle size of 154.23 ± 7.51 nm.Animal