Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 18 of 21Eloralintide literatureEuropean journal of psychotraumatology · Observational2026

Distinct correlates of post-traumatic stress disorder and subthreshold post-traumatic stress disorder considering a broad range of adverse experiences.

PTSD prevalence was 15.0% and subthreshold PTSD was 18.4% among trauma-exposed individuals, highlighting the importance of considering various trauma types in understanding PTSD symptoms.

Read at European journal of psychotraumatologyAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the eloralintide corpus
2
Preclinical
17
Observational · this one
0
Open-label
0
Randomised
2
Reviews

Summary and findings

This study examined the prevalence and correlates of PTSD and subthreshold PTSD among 500 outpatients aged 21-65 with mood or schizophrenia spectrum disorders in Singapore. PTSD prevalence was reported at 15.0%, while subthreshold PTSD was at 18.4% among individuals with Criterion A events. The study highlights the importance of considering both Criterion A and non-Criterion A events in understanding PTSD symptoms.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
PTSD prevalence was 15.0% among trauma-exposed individuals, n=461.n=5002026

Abstract

The authors’ words, as European journal of psychotraumatology supplied them

<b>Background:</b> While not all trauma-exposed individuals develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), many experience severe and enduring emotional effects. In Singapore, no study has investigated the prevalence and correlates of subthreshold PTSD and PTSD using gold-standard clinical interviews.<b>Objectives:</b> This study was the first to examine the prevalence and correlates of PTSD, subthreshold PTSD, and correlates associated while exploring a broad range of adverse experiences, including Criterion A (e.g. physical and sexual abuse) and non-Criterion A (e.g. emotional abuse) events.<b>Method:</b> We recruited 500 outpatients, aged 21-65, with mood or schizophrenia spectrum disorders from Singapore's only tertiary psychiatric hospital. Self-report measures assessed emotion dysregulation, suppression, and total trauma events. Clinical interviews, like the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5), measured dissociation and PTSD, while the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale measured negative affect. Among trauma-exposed individuals (<i>n</i> = 461), multinomial regression examined differences between subthreshold PTSD, PTSD and the no-PTSD reference group, with analyses conducted separately for Criterion A and non-Criterion A events.<b>Results:</b> In the overall sample, PTSD prevalence was 15.0% and subthreshold PTSD was 18.4% among individuals with an index event classified as Criterion A. PTSD following an index event classified as Criterion A was associated with a broader range of correlates than index events classified as non-Criterion A. Conversely, among individuals exposed to events classified as non-Criterion A, PTSD was primarily associated with emotional correlates when subthreshold PTSD was defined as 'two of four criteria.' PTSD is also associated with a broader set of correlates than subthreshold PTSD across exposure types and subthreshold PTSD definitions. Correlates of subthreshold PTSD vary depending on exposure type. Negative affect was most frequently associated with multiple definitions of subthreshold PTSD and PTSD across trauma types.<b>Conclusion:</b> Findings suggest distinct symptom profiles by trauma type and emphasise the clinical relevance of non-Criterion A events and subthreshold PTSD.

Background

This paper addresses the prevalence and correlates of PTSD and subthreshold PTSD in trauma-exposed individuals, particularly in the context of a Singaporean psychiatric population. Prior research has established that not all trauma-exposed individuals develop PTSD, but there is limited understanding of subthreshold PTSD and its correlates. The study is significant as it utilizes gold-standard clinical interviews to explore a range of adverse experiences, contributing to the understanding of PTSD in diverse contexts.

Methods

The study employed a cross-sectional design with a sample of 500 outpatients aged 21-65 from Singapore's only tertiary psychiatric hospital. Participants were assessed using self-report measures for emotion dysregulation and total trauma events, alongside clinical interviews like the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) for PTSD diagnosis. Multinomial regression was used to analyze differences between subthreshold PTSD, PTSD, and a no-PTSD reference group, with separate analyses for Criterion A and non-Criterion A events.

Results

In the overall sample, PTSD prevalence was 15.0% and subthreshold PTSD was 18.4% among individuals with Criterion A events. The study found that PTSD associated with Criterion A events had a broader range of correlates compared to those associated with non-Criterion A events. Negative affect was the most frequently reported correlate across multiple definitions of subthreshold PTSD and PTSD.

Interpretation

The findings suggest that PTSD and subthreshold PTSD have distinct symptom profiles based on the type of trauma experienced. Although the study provides valuable insights, the effect sizes and clinical significance of these findings require careful consideration. Limitations such as the specific population studied and potential biases from self-report measures may affect the generalizability of the results.

Key findings

  • PTSD prevalence was 15.0% among trauma-exposed individuals, n=461.
  • Subthreshold PTSD prevalence was 18.4% among trauma-exposed individuals with Criterion A events.
  • PTSD following Criterion A events was associated with a broader range of correlates than non-Criterion A events.
  • Negative affect was frequently associated with multiple definitions of subthreshold PTSD and PTSD across trauma types.

Limitations

  • Focus on a specific population in Singapore limits generalizability.
  • Reliance on self-report measures may introduce bias.
  • Cross-sectional design does not establish causality.
  • Small sample size for certain subgroup analyses.

Elsewhere in the Eloralintide corpus

BLinks between personality functioning and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms: a network analysis.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026 · n=1899 · E=0.31HumanBDrivers of farmers' intentions to adopt genome-edited cassava resistant to cassava brown streak disease in Uganda.GM crops & food · 2026 · n=357 · Not reported in abstract.HumanBBarriers to satisfactory primary care contacts for Swedish cancer survivors: a cross-sectional survey.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2023 · n=2131 · 67% (1429/2131) reported one or more barriers to satisfactory primary care contacts.HumanBReal-world creatine supplementation: a large-scale cross-sectional study of use, knowledge, and experiences.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2026 · n=2178 · Mean satisfaction of 7.8/10.HumanBHealth service delivery and disease management across Ethiopian health care facilities: An evidence-based analysis of tuberculosis program performance and system determinants.Dialogues in health · 2026 · n=112 · Pediatric TB detection was 2.1% vs. WHO's 12%.reviewBClinical Outcomes and Predictors of Adverse Events in Influenza Patients Managed in a Hospital-at-Home Program: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.American journal of medicine open · 2026 · n=270 · 12.4% had ED visits at 30 days, n=270.Human