Evaluation of [<sup>225</sup>Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 vis-a-vis Rechallenge [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT Versus Cabazitaxel or Oral Metronomic Chemotherapy in mCRPC: An Observational Analysis of Outcome and Toxicity Profiles in a Real-World Clinical Scenario.
[225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 shows promise for mCRPC with better survival and manageable toxicity, but further trials are needed.
Where it sits
this study against the rest of the vipivotide corpusSummary and findings
This observational study evaluated the efficacy, toxicity, and survival outcomes of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617, rechallenge [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, cabazitaxel, and oral metronomic cyclophosphamide in 66 mCRPC patients. Patients treated with [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 showed a PSA decline of >50% and a disease control rate of 60% with mild toxicities. Median overall survival was 12 months, with longer survival in [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 and cabazitaxel groups.
Abstract
<h4>Introduction</h4>A subset of prostate cancer progresses to aggressive state of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), wherein multiple therapeutic options demonstrate limited success rates. In this observational study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and survival outcomes of (a) [<sup>225</sup>Ac]Ac-PSMA-617, (b) rechallenge [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, (c) cabazitaxel, and (d) oral metronomic cyclophosphamide treatments in postdocetaxel mCRPC patients with progressive disease following initial course of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 or without previous [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT (PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy).<h4>Methods</h4>The study reviewed the medical records of mCRPC patients who had documented disease progression following treatment with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and docetaxel. These patients had multiple therapeutic options and treated with [<sup>225</sup>Ac]Ac-PSMA-617(alpha based-PRLT) or rechallenge [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 or chemotherapy with cabazitaxel or metronomic cyclophosphamide. We stratified the latter group (chemotherapy) based on prior exposure to initial course of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 as received and not received. We evaluated and analyzed the response outcomes from these therapies under five headings: (a) symptomatic response, (b) biochemical response, (c) functional and anatomical imaging response, (d) survival outcomes, and (e) toxicity profiles.<h4>Results</h4>A total 66 mCRPC patients were included and analyzed in this study. These patients were divided into two cohorts. Cohort 1 (n = 49 patients) received initial course of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and cohort 2 (n = 17 patients) not received initial course of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. The patients were divided into arm A to F based upon treatment received as follows: Cohort 1- arm A (n = 15 patients) received [<sup>225</sup>Ac]Ac-PSMA-617, arm B (n = 18 patients) received rechallenge [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, arm C (n = 8 patients) received cabazitaxel, arm D (n = 8 patients) received metronomic cyclophosphamide. Cohort 2- arm E (n = 14 patients) cabazitaxel and arm F (n = 3 patients) metronomic cyclophosphamide. Patients in arm A showed favorable response outcomes in terms of symptomatic response evaluation and quality-of-life performance, biochemical and imaging response evaluation, with a PSA decline of > 50% and disease control rate (DCR) of 60% patients and 80% respectively. Patients treated with rechallenge [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and chemotherapy also showed modest response rates. For toxicity profiles, arm A and arm B patients had mild and manageable toxicities, contrary to arm C, D, E, and F, wherein severe clinical and hematological toxicities were observed in a significant fraction of patients. Median progressive free survival (PFS) for the overall cohort (cohort 1 and 2) was 5 months (95% CI: 4-7 months), with no significant difference across treatment arms (p = 0.28). Median overall survival (OS) for entire cohort was 12 months (95% CI: 9-15 months) with significantly longer OS in arm A and E patients compared to other arms (p = 0.0358).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Postdocetaxel mCRPC patients with progressive disease following initial course of [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 when treated with [<sup>225</sup>Ac]Ac-PSMA-617PRLT showed favorable and encouraging clinical, biochemical, and imaging response rates along with longer PFS and OS with minimal treatment-related toxicities. Rechallenge [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and chemotherapy-based approaches also provided clinical benefit in selected patients, reflecting the range of salvage treatment strategies employed in real-world practice. Future large-sized, prospective randomized trials are needed to establish the efficacy of all these treatments particularly alpha-based PRLT in clinical practice of mCRPC patients.
Background
Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) represents an aggressive stage of prostate cancer with limited treatment success. This study addresses the need to evaluate various treatment options for mCRPC patients who have progressed after standard therapies. The research is significant as it explores real-world outcomes of different salvage therapies in a clinical setting.
Methods
This observational study reviewed medical records of 66 mCRPC patients who progressed after androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and docetaxel. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on prior [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 treatment. Treatments included [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617, rechallenge [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, cabazitaxel, and metronomic cyclophosphamide. Outcomes assessed were symptomatic response, biochemical response, imaging response, survival outcomes, and toxicity profiles.
Results
Patients treated with [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 showed a PSA decline of >50% and a disease control rate of 60%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 12 months. The [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 group had significantly longer OS compared to other treatments (p=0.0358). Toxicities were mild in [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 groups, while more severe in chemotherapy groups.
Interpretation
The study suggests that [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 may offer a favorable balance of efficacy and toxicity for mCRPC patients compared to other salvage therapies. However, the lack of randomization and small sample size limit the strength of these conclusions. The findings align with previous research indicating potential benefits of PSMA-targeted therapies, but larger randomized trials are necessary to confirm these results.
Key findings
- PSA decline of >50% in 60% of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 patients.
- Disease control rate of 80% in [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 patients.
- Median PFS for the cohort was 5 months (95% CI: 4-7 months).
- Median OS for the cohort was 12 months (95% CI: 9-15 months).
- Significantly longer OS in [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 and cabazitaxel groups (p=0.0358).
Limitations
- Observational study design
- Small sample size (n=66)
- Lack of randomization
- Short median follow-up
- Single-site study