Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 15 of 29Tirzepatide literatureBMJ (Clinical research ed.)Top journal2026

Tirzepatide and the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events: population based cohort study.

Not reported in abstract.

Read at BMJ (Clinical research ed.)Add to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the tirzepatide corpus
3
Preclinical
19
Observational
1
Open-label · this one
3
Randomised
3
Reviews

Summary and findings

Not reported in abstract.

How much of this paper we could read: title only (0.10). The feed gave us little more than the title, so our summary is thin. This says nothing about the study's quality — read the source. What this means →
2026

Abstract

The authors’ words, as BMJ (Clinical research ed.) supplied them

Objective To estimate the magnitude of reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) that would be observed in clinical practice from adding tirzepatide to standard of care treatment. Design Population based cohort study, using a design, data, and analytical approach previously benchmarked against randomised trials. Setting Two national US claims databases, May 2022 to May 2025. Participants 52 971 participants aged ≥40 years with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who initiated tirzepatide (n=35 353) or sitagliptin (n=17 618), a cardiovascular outcome neutral comparator serving as a placebo proxy. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment groups after propensity score overlap weighting. Main outcome measures The main outcome, MACE, was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all cause mortality and its individual components. Follow-up started the day after treatment initiation and continued until occurrence of the outcome, disenrollment from the health plan, treatment discontinuation or switching, or one year. Safety outcomes included infections requiring hospital admission and infection related mortality. Two negative control outcomes, lumbar radiculopathy and abdominal hernia, were analysed to assess residual confounding. Results At one year, the weighted one year risk of MACE was 2.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5% to 3.4%) in the tirzepatide group and 4.4% (3.8% to 4.9%) in the sitagliptin group (risk difference -1.4%, 95% CI -2.1% to -0.7%; number needed to treat (NNT)=70), corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.68 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.80). For individual MACE components, tirzepatide was associated with a lower hazard for myocardial infarction (hazard ratio 0.67, 0.52 to 0.87; NNT=130), whereas ischaemic stroke showed no meaningful difference (0.91, 0.64 to 1.28; NNT 2500). Infections requiring hospital admission were lower with tirzepatide (0.64, 0.55 to 0.75; NNT=48), as was infection related mortality (0.40, 0.26 to 0.61; NNT=200) and all cause mortality (0.55, 0.42 to 0.72; NNT=122). Negative control outcomes showed no association. Conclusions In this cohort study using an approach benchmarked against randomised trials, initiating tirzepatide reduced the risk of MACE compared with a placebo proxy among people with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Reductions in infection related events suggest broader non-atherosclerotic biological mechanisms may contribute to the observed benefit. This study shows how trial-anchored evidence from clinical practice can estimate the expected cardiovascular benefit of initiating tirzepatide beyond standard background treatment and inform shared decision making. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07203677.

Background

Not reported in abstract.

Methods

Not reported in abstract.

Results

Not reported in abstract.

Interpretation

Not reported in abstract.

Limitations

Not reported in abstract.

Elsewhere in the Tirzepatide corpus

B12-month weight-loss trajectories and predictors of response to tirzepatide under individualized dosing: A multicenter real-world study.Obesity pillars · 2026 · n=249 · Mean weight loss was 19.9 ± 8.6% at 12 months.HumanBReal-world, digital-first delivery of GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in women.Nature medicine · 2026 · Mean weight reduction was 16.1 kg (95% CI 15.9 to 16.2; P < 0.001).HumanAEvaluation of clinical relevance of weight nadirs and weight regain during 3 years of treatment with tirzepatide in participants with obesity or overweight and prediabetes.Obesity pillars · 2026 · Mean weight regain from nadir to Week 176 was 3.8 kg for 5 mg, 4.4 kg for 10 mg, and 3.7 kg for 15 mg.HumanBQuantitative Insights into Tirzepatide and Semaglutide Using Longitudinal Systems Modeling.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026 · Not reported in abstract.HumanDEstimating the True MACE Benefits From Tirzepatide in SURPASS-CVOT Using an Imputed Placebo Analysis of REWIND.Diabetes care · 2026 · HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.55, 0.94 for MACE-3 comparing tirzepatide versus placebo.reviewBDual GIP/GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Versus Selective GLP-1 Receptor Agonist in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee or Hip Arthroplastybiorxiv-preprint · 2026 · At 2 years, tirzepatide exposure was associated with lower odds of mechanical complications (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.96).Human