Cagrilintide-semaglutide (CagriSema) versus semaglutide or cagrilintide in people with type 2 diabetes (REIMAGINE 2): a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study.

Cagrilintide-semaglutide (2.4 mg each) demonstrated a statistically significant greater reduction in HbA1c compared to semaglutide alone in people with type 2 diabetes.

Summary and findings

This study measured the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of cagrilintide and semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity. Participants received either cagrilintide-semaglutide (2.4 mg each), semaglutide (2.4 mg), or cagrilintide (2.4 mg) for 68 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 68.

Abstract

Background The amylin receptor agonist cagrilintide and the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide have complementary effects on glycaemic control and bodyweight. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of cagrilintide and semaglutide (cagrilintide-semaglutide; known as CagriSema) versus semaglutide or cagrilintide for glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes and overweight or obesity. Methods REIMAGINE 2 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled, parallel-group study conducted in 30 countries (trial sites included university hospitals, health-care centres, research centres, and other centres). Participants aged 18 years or older with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 7·0-10·5% [53-91 mmol/mol]) receiving metformin with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor, and a BMI of 25 kg/m2 or more, were randomly assigned (8:8:2:8:8:1:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous cagrilintide 2·4 mg plus semaglutide 2·4 mg (hereafter cagrilintide-semaglutide [2·4 mg each]), semaglutide 2·4 mg, cagrilintide 2·4 mg, cagrilintide 1·0 mg plus semaglutide 1·0 mg (hereafter cagrilintide-semaglutide [1·0 mg each]), semaglutide 1·0 mg, or corresponding placebo for 68 weeks. Randomisation was done using a web-based system with blocked randomisation (block size 36) and stratification according to inclusion in the continuous glucose monitoring subgroup, HbA1c less than 8·5% at screening (yes or no), and country of participation (Japan; yes or no). The study participants, investigators, and study sponsor staff were masked to treatment allocation within dose level throughout the study. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 68 with cagrilintide-semaglutide (2·4 mg each) versus semaglutide 2·4 mg in the full analysis set; safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study product. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06065540) and is complete. Findings From Oct 10, 2023, to July 29, 2024, 3593 people were screened for eligibility, 2713 of whom were randomly assigned to cagrilintide-semaglutide (2·4 mg each; n=603), semaglutide 2·4 mg (n=605), cagrilintide 2·4 mg (n=152), cagrilintide-semaglutide (1·0 mg each; n=595), semaglutide 1·0 mg (n=609), or placebo (pooled 2·4 mg and 1·0 mg; n=149). 1164 (42·9%) of 2713 were female, 1549 (57·1%) were male, and 2207 (81·3%) were White. Of the randomly assigned participants, 2595 (95·7%) completed the study and 2376 (87·6%) were on treatment at week 68. Mean baseline HbA1c was 8·2% (SD 0·9). For the primary endpoint using the efficacy estimand, mean HbA1c change was significantly greater with cagrilintide-semaglutide (2·4 mg each) versus semaglutide 2·4 mg (-1·91 percentage points [SE 0·04] vs -1·75 percentage points [0·04]; estimated treatment difference -0·16 percentage points [95% CI -0·27 to -0·05]; p=0·0035). Adverse events were reported in 524 (86·9%) of 603 participants in the cagrilintide-semaglutide (2·4 mg each) group, 491 (81·2%) of 605 in the semaglutide 2·4 mg group, 125 (82·2%) of 152 in the cagrilintide 2·4 mg group, 485 (81·6%) of 594 in the cagrilintide-semaglutide (1·0 mg each) group, 477 (78·5%) of 608 in the semaglutide 1·0 mg group, and 105 (70·5%) of 149 in the placebo group. The most common adverse events in the active treatment groups were gastrointestinal disorders. Interpretation Cagrilintide-semaglutide (2·4 mg each) was superior to semaglutide 2·4 mg in reducing HbA1c in participants with type 2 diabetes receiving metformin with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor. The safety profile of cagrilintide-semaglutide was consistent with the GLP-1 receptor agonist class and previous safety data for cagrilintide. These findings support the added benefit of cagrilintide-semaglutide (2·4 mg each) versus semaglutide 2·4 mg for glycaemic control. Funding Novo Nordisk.

Key findings

• Mean HbA1c change was significantly greater with cagrilintide-semaglutide (2.4 mg each) versus semaglutide 2.4 mg (-1.91 percentage points vs -1.75 percentage points; p=0.0035).
• Estimated treatment difference was -0.16 percentage points (95% CI -0.27 to -0.05).
• Adverse events were reported in 524 (86.9%) of 603 participants in the cagrilintide-semaglutide (2.4 mg each) group.
• The most common adverse events in the active treatment groups were gastrointestinal disorders.
• Of the randomly assigned participants, 2595 (95.7%) completed the study.
• Mean baseline HbA1c was 8.2% (SD 0.9).

Limitations

• Industry-funded by Novo Nordisk.
• Majority of participants were White, limiting generalizability.
• Short follow-up duration of 68 weeks.
• Potential confounding factors in participant selection.

Elsewhere in the Cagrilintide (AM833) corpus