Peptides DB
Research-centric peptide and protocol reference hub
Study 7 of 11CJC-1295 literatureThe lancet. Healthy longevity · RCT · Phase 4Top journal2026

Metformin added to lifestyle intervention for physical function in older adults with obesity (DEMFOS trial): a randomised controlled trial.

In older adults with obesity, adding metformin to an intensive lifestyle intervention does not significantly improve physical function compared to placebo.

Read at The lancet. Healthy longevityAdd to compare

Where it sits

this study against the rest of the cjc-1295 corpus
4
Preclinical
2
Observational
0
Open-label
2
Randomised · this one
3
Reviews

Summary and findings

This study evaluated the effect of metformin added to an intensive lifestyle intervention on physical function in older adults with obesity. The trial included 114 participants aged 65-85 years. No significant improvement in physical function was observed with metformin compared to placebo.

How much of this paper we could read: full text read (0.80). We had a clear abstract, so the summary below closely tracks the paper. What this means →
At 6 months, physical performance test improvement was greater in the intensive lifestyle plus metformin group than in the healthy lifestyle plus metformin group (mean difference 2·5 points, 95% CI 1·2-3·8; p=0·0002)n=114Phase 42026

Abstract

The authors’ words, as The lancet. Healthy longevity supplied them

<h4>Background</h4>Obesity in older adults is associated with functional decline and increased risk of disability. Lifestyle interventions improve physical function, but the role of metformin as an adjunct to lifestyle intervention in this population remains unclear. In this randomised clinical trial, we evaluated whether metformin enhances the effects of an intensive lifestyle intervention on physical function in older adults with obesity.<h4>Methods</h4>The Diet and Exercise plus Metformin to Treat Frailty in Obese Seniors (DEMFOS) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04221750 [completed]) was a randomised, placebo-controlled trial conducted at the Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX, USA). Older adults (aged 65-85 years) with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomly assigned to intensive lifestyle intervention (weight-management and exercise training) plus placebo, intensive lifestyle intervention plus metformin, or healthy lifestyle (diet education) plus metformin groups. The primary outcome was change in the modified physical performance test score at 6 months. The primary analysis was by intention-to-treat.<h4>Findings</h4>Of 221 participants assessed for eligibility between March 30, 2021, and Dec 12, 2024, 114 were included in this study (mean age 72·8 years [SD 5·2]; 101 [89%] men and 13 [11%] women). 64 (56%) participants were White, 50 (44%) were Black, and 15 (13%) were Hispanic or Latino. Changes in physical performance test differed between groups (group-by-time interaction p<0·0001). At 6 months, physical performance test improvement was greater in the intensive lifestyle plus metformin group than in the healthy lifestyle plus metformin group (mean difference 2·5 points, 95% CI 1·2-3·8; p=0·0002), whereas there was no difference between the intensive lifestyle plus metformin and intensive lifestyle plus placebo groups (0·1 points, -1·2 to 1·4; p=0·92). Serious adverse events were infrequent and not attributed to the study interventions.<h4>Interpretation</h4>Our findings suggest that in older adults with obesity undergoing intensive lifestyle intervention, metformin does not provide additional improvement in physical function. These results support prioritising lifestyle-based strategies to improve functional outcomes in this population.<h4>Funding</h4>US Department of Veterans Affairs.

Background

This paper addresses the impact of metformin as an adjunct to lifestyle interventions on physical function in older adults with obesity. Previous research has indicated that lifestyle interventions can improve physical function, but the specific role of metformin remains unclear. Understanding whether metformin enhances these interventions is crucial for developing effective strategies for this population.

Methods

The DEMFOS trial was a randomised, placebo-controlled trial involving older adults aged 65-85 years with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²). Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: intensive lifestyle intervention plus placebo, intensive lifestyle intervention plus metformin, or healthy lifestyle plus metformin. The primary outcome was the change in the modified physical performance test score at 6 months, with an intention-to-treat analysis.

Results

At 6 months, the primary endpoint showed that the physical performance test improvement was greater in the intensive lifestyle plus metformin group compared to the healthy lifestyle plus metformin group, with a mean difference of 2·5 points (95% CI 1·2-3·8; p=0·0002). However, there was no significant difference between the intensive lifestyle plus metformin and intensive lifestyle plus placebo groups (0·1 points, -1·2 to 1·4; p=0·92).

Interpretation

The findings suggest that while metformin may enhance the effects of lifestyle interventions compared to a healthy lifestyle alone, it does not provide additional benefits over placebo when combined with intensive lifestyle interventions. The effect size observed in the comparison between metformin and placebo was negligible, indicating limited clinical significance. The study's limitations, including a small sample size and short follow-up duration, may affect the generalizability of the results.

Key findings

  • At 6 months, physical performance test improvement was greater in the intensive lifestyle plus metformin group than in the healthy lifestyle plus metformin group (mean difference 2·5 points, 95% CI 1·2-3·8; p=0·0002)
  • There was no difference between the intensive lifestyle plus metformin and intensive lifestyle plus placebo groups (0·1 points, -1·2 to 1·4; p=0·92)
  • Of 221 participants assessed for eligibility, 114 were included in this study (mean age 72·8 years [SD 5·2]; 101 [89%] men and 13 [11%] women)
  • 64 (56%) participants were White, 50 (44%) were Black, and 15 (13%) were Hispanic or Latino
  • Serious adverse events were infrequent and not attributed to the study interventions

Limitations

  • small sample size (n=114)
  • only 6-month follow-up
  • specific population may limit generalizability
  • no significant clinical improvement observed

Elsewhere in the CJC-1295 corpus

ADengzhanxixin injection for acute ischemic stroke after reperfusion therapy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center clinical trial.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026 · n=246 · 78.21% with mRS 0-1 at 90 days in high-dose groupHumanBRobotic-assisted intracorporeal radical cystectomy with modified ileal conduit reduces ureteroileal anastomotic stenosis risk: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.Annals of medicine · 2026 · n=69 · 0% stenosis in robotic group vs 15.22% in laparoscopic, p=0.043HumanDRecommendations for quality care indicators in severe asthma multidisciplinary units in Portugal (PRECISION project): A nationwide consensus.Pulmonology · 2026 · n=45 · Consensus achieved on 28/54 statements (51.9%).reviewBDevelopment and diagnostic performance of a modified O-RADS model incorporating septa number and blood flow for adnexal lesions.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2026 · n=723 · Malignancy rate of 45.3% in the 4b subclass (86 masses), n=86.HumanDInjectable Peptides in Sports Medicine: A Structured Narrative Review of Evidence, Safety, and Antidoping Implications.europepmc · 2026reviewDInjectable Peptides in Sports Medicine: A Structured Narrative Review of Evidence, Safety, and Antidoping Implications.PubMed · 2026review